Scholarlink

<p>The exponential growth of scientific papers has intensified competition within academia, leading researchers to strategically use positive language to enhance the visibility and appeal of their work. Previous evidence suggests that the use of positive language in scientific papers can increase their impact. However, the credibility of this strategy, particularly regarding the relationship between positive words and scientific quality, has yet to undergo rigorous empirical scrutiny. This study explores this relationship by drawing on self-presentation theory, differentiating between authentic self-presentation and exaggerated self-advocacy. Analyzing 124,144 management scientific papers from 2001 to 2020, our findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the presence of positive words in titles and abstracts and paper quality, suggesting that positive language serves as a credible signal of higher-quality research. Cross-validation and robustness checks further affirm the stability of these results. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of linguistic strategies in academic writing, advocating for the genuine use of positive language to promote the merits of high-quality scientific ideas and findings.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Authenticity or self-advocacy? Identifying the credibility of positive words in scientific titles and abstracts

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月7日

查看全文
  • Huidong Wu,
  • Jianping Li,
  • Dengsheng Wu

摘要

The exponential growth of scientific papers has intensified competition within academia, leading researchers to strategically use positive language to enhance the visibility and appeal of their work. Previous evidence suggests that the use of positive language in scientific papers can increase their impact. However, the credibility of this strategy, particularly regarding the relationship between positive words and scientific quality, has yet to undergo rigorous empirical scrutiny. This study explores this relationship by drawing on self-presentation theory, differentiating between authentic self-presentation and exaggerated self-advocacy. Analyzing 124,144 management scientific papers from 2001 to 2020, our findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the presence of positive words in titles and abstracts and paper quality, suggesting that positive language serves as a credible signal of higher-quality research. Cross-validation and robustness checks further affirm the stability of these results. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of linguistic strategies in academic writing, advocating for the genuine use of positive language to promote the merits of high-quality scientific ideas and findings.