<p>This paper analyses how R&amp;D persistence is affected both by direct learning determinants and indirect determinants through enhanced productivity. Advancing previous research, we allow for three distinct forms of R&amp;D experience through which learning occurs: the firm’s current within-spell learning; learning derived from the firm’s cumulative R&amp;D experience; and the potential detrimental effect of punctuated learning, where a firm’s cumulative R&amp;D experience is divided into multiple R&amp;D spells. Our findings suggest markedly different learning processes depending on firm size and technology. Small and large firms, and firms operating in low and med-tech sectors benefit from cumulative previous R&amp;D but medium-sized and high-tech firms do not. However, a history of fragmented or intermittent R&amp;D is negatively associated with R&amp;D persistence for all firm sizes, but not for low-tech firms. While cumulative R&amp;D experience improves productivity for all firms, there is evidence of an indirect (productivity) association of R&amp;D experience on subsequent R&amp;D persistence only for SMEs and low-tech firms.&#xa0;</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cumulative versus punctuated patterns of R&D learning, productivity and R&D persistence

  • Juan A. Mañez,
  • James H. Love,
  • Ana Luiza Terra

摘要

This paper analyses how R&D persistence is affected both by direct learning determinants and indirect determinants through enhanced productivity. Advancing previous research, we allow for three distinct forms of R&D experience through which learning occurs: the firm’s current within-spell learning; learning derived from the firm’s cumulative R&D experience; and the potential detrimental effect of punctuated learning, where a firm’s cumulative R&D experience is divided into multiple R&D spells. Our findings suggest markedly different learning processes depending on firm size and technology. Small and large firms, and firms operating in low and med-tech sectors benefit from cumulative previous R&D but medium-sized and high-tech firms do not. However, a history of fragmented or intermittent R&D is negatively associated with R&D persistence for all firm sizes, but not for low-tech firms. While cumulative R&D experience improves productivity for all firms, there is evidence of an indirect (productivity) association of R&D experience on subsequent R&D persistence only for SMEs and low-tech firms.