<p>In this article I argue that the field of developmental psychopathology has undergone a significant ideological distortion in recent years, driven largely by the rise of progressive social justice norms often referred to as “Woke” ideology within the social and medical sciences. After tracing the field’s origins from the early 1980s and its decades of generative intellectual and research output, I then describe how this trajectory was disrupted following the sociopolitical upheaval that occurred after the death of George Floyd in 2020. A rapid reorientation toward activist scholarship, an intense focus on social determinants to the exclusion of biological and genetic factors, and the institutionalization of diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates have reduced scientific rigor and constrained the range of acceptable hypotheses. Core constructs such as normality, diagnostic categories, and biological sex have been reframed as oppressive, leading to conceptual confusion and weakening the field’s ability to generate valid empirical insights. I also highlight epistemological and methodological shortcomings in recent research that attributes psychopathology primarily to systemic social forces while neglecting potential biological and genetic determinants. To restore credibility, I argue that a post progressive developmental evolutionary psychopathology is necessary. It should be grounded in a renewed commitment to the classical biopsychosocial model, openness to genetically and biologically informed research designs, rejection of activism driven approaches to “destigmatization,” and engagement with pluralistic philosophical and sociobiological perspectives on psychiatric constructs. Only by returning to its foundational scientific ethos can the field regain its scientific value while contributing meaningfully to human well-being.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Retrospect & prospect: a post-progressive developmental evolutionary psychopathology

  • John D. Haltigan

摘要

In this article I argue that the field of developmental psychopathology has undergone a significant ideological distortion in recent years, driven largely by the rise of progressive social justice norms often referred to as “Woke” ideology within the social and medical sciences. After tracing the field’s origins from the early 1980s and its decades of generative intellectual and research output, I then describe how this trajectory was disrupted following the sociopolitical upheaval that occurred after the death of George Floyd in 2020. A rapid reorientation toward activist scholarship, an intense focus on social determinants to the exclusion of biological and genetic factors, and the institutionalization of diversity, equity, and inclusion mandates have reduced scientific rigor and constrained the range of acceptable hypotheses. Core constructs such as normality, diagnostic categories, and biological sex have been reframed as oppressive, leading to conceptual confusion and weakening the field’s ability to generate valid empirical insights. I also highlight epistemological and methodological shortcomings in recent research that attributes psychopathology primarily to systemic social forces while neglecting potential biological and genetic determinants. To restore credibility, I argue that a post progressive developmental evolutionary psychopathology is necessary. It should be grounded in a renewed commitment to the classical biopsychosocial model, openness to genetically and biologically informed research designs, rejection of activism driven approaches to “destigmatization,” and engagement with pluralistic philosophical and sociobiological perspectives on psychiatric constructs. Only by returning to its foundational scientific ethos can the field regain its scientific value while contributing meaningfully to human well-being.