<p>The paper demonstrates the utility of the project to identify and deploy high-leverage sociological concepts that I recently advocated in these pages (Brint&#xa0;<CitationRef CitationID="CR9">2025</CitationRef>). The paper takes up two of the high-leverage concepts identified in that paper: (1) interaction ritual chains, and (2) social closure mechanisms. The paper begins with a summary of my 2025 argument. The paper then discusses the two concepts using the framework advanced there. I show how the two fit the criteria I established for identifying high-leverage sociological concepts. I provide illustrations of how they have been deployed across a wide range of settings, subfields, and levels of analysis. I also suggest revisions in the existing conceptualizations and applications to improve their analytical and explanatory power, and I identify conditioning variables that influence their impact on social relations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

High-leverage sociological concepts: an extension with two cases

  • Steven Brint

摘要

The paper demonstrates the utility of the project to identify and deploy high-leverage sociological concepts that I recently advocated in these pages (Brint 2025). The paper takes up two of the high-leverage concepts identified in that paper: (1) interaction ritual chains, and (2) social closure mechanisms. The paper begins with a summary of my 2025 argument. The paper then discusses the two concepts using the framework advanced there. I show how the two fit the criteria I established for identifying high-leverage sociological concepts. I provide illustrations of how they have been deployed across a wide range of settings, subfields, and levels of analysis. I also suggest revisions in the existing conceptualizations and applications to improve their analytical and explanatory power, and I identify conditioning variables that influence their impact on social relations.