Scholarlink

<p>Heterodox Academy requires its members to pledge their support for its three ideals: open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement. Given the history of loyalty oaths in academia, it is surprising that a society that bills itself the way Heterodox Academy does would require one. And there is a more serious problem. “Constructive Disagreement”, as Heterodox Academy understands and advocates for it, is inconsistent with open inquiry and viewpoint diversity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Why I am not HxA: how “constructive disagreement” undermines open inquiry and viewpoint diversity

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月15日

查看全文
  • Michael Veber

摘要

Heterodox Academy requires its members to pledge their support for its three ideals: open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement. Given the history of loyalty oaths in academia, it is surprising that a society that bills itself the way Heterodox Academy does would require one. And there is a more serious problem. “Constructive Disagreement”, as Heterodox Academy understands and advocates for it, is inconsistent with open inquiry and viewpoint diversity.