<p>Given the uncertain and complex challenges faced by the younger generation, it is essential to equip them with the competencies necessary to respond to these risks effectively. This study aimed to identify the <i>Risk Response Competencies</i> (RR-Competencies) that should be incorporated into science education for K-12 students. Using a three-round Delphi method, we gathered insights from 27 Korean experts across five professional domains: Science Education Research, School Science Teaching, Science and Engineering, Science/Risk Communication, and Science Education Policies. The research led to the development of a comprehensive framework comprising nine <i>RR-Competencies</i>, categorised into three primary contexts: (1) awareness of risk through scientific knowledge and thinking, (2) assessment of risk through scientific inquiry based on data, and (3) action on risk management through scientific problem solving and decision-making with collaborative, participatory, and resilient approaches. Clarifying these competencies can contribute to providing clear pedagogical goals for risk response in science education. This framework enhances our understanding of risk in science education and provides practical guidance for educators to develop tailored teaching strategies to cultivate these competencies among students.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Risk Response Competencies in Science Education: A Delphi Study of Experts

  • Oksu Hong,
  • Jina Chang,
  • Jinhee Kim

摘要

Given the uncertain and complex challenges faced by the younger generation, it is essential to equip them with the competencies necessary to respond to these risks effectively. This study aimed to identify the Risk Response Competencies (RR-Competencies) that should be incorporated into science education for K-12 students. Using a three-round Delphi method, we gathered insights from 27 Korean experts across five professional domains: Science Education Research, School Science Teaching, Science and Engineering, Science/Risk Communication, and Science Education Policies. The research led to the development of a comprehensive framework comprising nine RR-Competencies, categorised into three primary contexts: (1) awareness of risk through scientific knowledge and thinking, (2) assessment of risk through scientific inquiry based on data, and (3) action on risk management through scientific problem solving and decision-making with collaborative, participatory, and resilient approaches. Clarifying these competencies can contribute to providing clear pedagogical goals for risk response in science education. This framework enhances our understanding of risk in science education and provides practical guidance for educators to develop tailored teaching strategies to cultivate these competencies among students.