Scholarlink

<p>This study evaluates the impact of virtual instruction on student performance, addressing the ongoing debate about virtuality in higher education. In 2022, the Social Sciences Faculty at <i>Universidad de la República</i>, Uruguay, introduced the Online Learning Pilot Experience program. We assess outcomes in three mandatory courses, employing matching techniques and considering the sequential nature of evaluation. Findings indicate that students in virtual courses are less likely to remain active, achieve course approval, or perform as well on intermediate assessments compared to face-to-face counterparts. Using alternative identification strategies, including randomized control trials and proxies for student ability, we confirm the robustness of these effects. Analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects reveals that virtual instruction is beneficial or has no significant impact for students facing constraints on in-person attendance, such as caregiving responsibilities, full-time employment, or distance from campus. These results underscore the importance of targeted virtual programs to maximize inclusivity and effectiveness.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Virtual Instruction Effects Within University Courses: A Boon for Those Who Need it, a Bane for Others

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月14日

查看全文
  • Manuel Flores,
  • Mariana Gerstenblüth,
  • Lucía Suarez

摘要

This study evaluates the impact of virtual instruction on student performance, addressing the ongoing debate about virtuality in higher education. In 2022, the Social Sciences Faculty at Universidad de la República, Uruguay, introduced the Online Learning Pilot Experience program. We assess outcomes in three mandatory courses, employing matching techniques and considering the sequential nature of evaluation. Findings indicate that students in virtual courses are less likely to remain active, achieve course approval, or perform as well on intermediate assessments compared to face-to-face counterparts. Using alternative identification strategies, including randomized control trials and proxies for student ability, we confirm the robustness of these effects. Analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects reveals that virtual instruction is beneficial or has no significant impact for students facing constraints on in-person attendance, such as caregiving responsibilities, full-time employment, or distance from campus. These results underscore the importance of targeted virtual programs to maximize inclusivity and effectiveness.