<p><?tk 4?>Daily equity return forecasting exhibits low signal-to-noise ratios, heavy tails, volatility clustering, and frequent regime changes. We propose a compact, leak-safe forecasting pipeline that combines (i) guard-banded rolling MODWT/MRA feature construction (LA8, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(J=3\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) computed strictly from past-only windows (rolling window <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(W_{\textrm{mra}}=256\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, guard <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(g_{\textrm{mra}}=49\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, periodic boundary), (ii) volatility-normalized targets with past-only scaling, and (iii) time-decayed residual stacking with validation-only simplex-constrained weights and a post-hoc affine calibration. On SPY daily log-returns over 2018–2024 (with auxiliary series QQQ, IWM, GLD, TLT), the reference ensemble (TD+Cal) attains a test <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{RMSE}=0.007979\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{MAE}=0.005856\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Its out-of-sample <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(R^2_{\textrm{OS}}=0.481\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is defined relative to the NaiveLast benchmark <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n_t=y_{t-1}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and is therefore baseline-dependent. Diebold–Mariano and Clark–West tests with Newey–West HAC (main lag=5, lag sensitivity 0/5/10, Holm-adjusted across contrasts) provide <i>strong evidence against simple benchmarks</i> (NaiveLast and a rolling ARIMA benchmark), while differences relative to strong regularized linear and tree-based learners are small in magnitude and not statistically distinguishable after multiple-testing adjustment. Residual diagnostics (Ljung–Box and ARCH–LM on test errors) are reported as sanity checks and do not suggest pronounced remaining dependence at standard lags.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Strictly chronological forecasting of daily equity returns with rolling MODWT features and residual stacking

  • Çağlar Sözen,
  • Mervenur Sözen

摘要

Daily equity return forecasting exhibits low signal-to-noise ratios, heavy tails, volatility clustering, and frequent regime changes. We propose a compact, leak-safe forecasting pipeline that combines (i) guard-banded rolling MODWT/MRA feature construction (LA8, \(J=3\) ) computed strictly from past-only windows (rolling window \(W_{\textrm{mra}}=256\) , guard \(g_{\textrm{mra}}=49\) , periodic boundary), (ii) volatility-normalized targets with past-only scaling, and (iii) time-decayed residual stacking with validation-only simplex-constrained weights and a post-hoc affine calibration. On SPY daily log-returns over 2018–2024 (with auxiliary series QQQ, IWM, GLD, TLT), the reference ensemble (TD+Cal) attains a test \(\textrm{RMSE}=0.007979\) and \(\textrm{MAE}=0.005856\) . Its out-of-sample \(R^2_{\textrm{OS}}=0.481\) is defined relative to the NaiveLast benchmark \(n_t=y_{t-1}\) and is therefore baseline-dependent. Diebold–Mariano and Clark–West tests with Newey–West HAC (main lag=5, lag sensitivity 0/5/10, Holm-adjusted across contrasts) provide strong evidence against simple benchmarks (NaiveLast and a rolling ARIMA benchmark), while differences relative to strong regularized linear and tree-based learners are small in magnitude and not statistically distinguishable after multiple-testing adjustment. Residual diagnostics (Ljung–Box and ARCH–LM on test errors) are reported as sanity checks and do not suggest pronounced remaining dependence at standard lags.