Why are we still suffering from the blind spot?
摘要
The “fallacy of misplaced concreteness” -- the error of mistaking scientific abstractions for concrete reality -- is a central preoccupation of The Blind Spot. In this commentary I raise a question about the surprising tenacity of this fallacy. Given that it was pinpointed by various philosophers one hundred years ago, why did it remain so prevalent that a book such as The Blind Spot needed to be published now? I outline three possible answers to this question, discussing how they shed a critical light on the arguments presented in the book.