错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A comparison between the adverse event profiles of patients receiving palbociclib and abemaciclib: analysis of two real-world databases

  • Tatsuaki Takeda,
  • Shiho Sugimoto,
  • Jun Matsumoto,
  • Naohiro Iwata,
  • Akihiko Nakamoto,
  • Aya Fukuma Ozaki,
  • Hirofumi Hamano,
  • Noritaka Ariyoshi,
  • Yoshito Zamami

摘要

Background

Palbociclib and abemaciclib are cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors currently used to treat breast cancer. Although their therapeutic efficacies are considered comparable, differences in adverse event (AE) profiles of the two drugs remain unclear.

Aim

We analysed two real-world databases, the World Health Organization’s VigiBase and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), to identify differences in AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib.

Method

Data of patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib recorded until December 2022 were extracted from the VigiBase and FAERS databases. In total, 200 types of AEs were analysed. The reporting odds ratios were calculated using a disproportionality analysis.

Results

Cytopenia was frequently reported in patients receiving palbociclib, whereas interstitial lung disease and diarrhoea were frequently reported in those receiving abemaciclib. Moreover, psychiatric and nervous system disorders were more common in the palbociclib group, whereas renal and urinary disorders were more common in the abemaciclib group.

Conclusion

This study is the first to show comprehensively the disparities in the AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib. The findings highlight the importance of considering these differences when selecting a suitable CDK4/6 inhibitor to ensure safe and favourable outcomes for patients with breast cancer.