Identification of Patients Who Require Two-Point Blood Sampling for the Peak and Trough Values Rather Than One-Point Blood Sampling for the Trough Value for the Evaluation of AUC of Vancomycin Using Bayesian Estimation

期刊论文
发表日期：

2024年10月21日

查看全文

Ayako Suzuki,
Masaru Samura,
Tomoyuki Ishigo,
Satoshi Fujii,
Yuta Ibe,
Hiroaki Yoshida,
Hiroaki Tanaka,
Fumiya Ebihara,
Takumi Maruyama,
Yukihiro Hamada,
Hisato Fujihara,
Fumihiro Yamaguchi,
Fumio Nagumo,
Toshiaki Komatsu,
Atsushi Tomizawa,
Akitoshi Takuma,
Hiroaki Chiba,
Yoshifumi Nishi,
Yuki Enoki,
Kazuaki Taguchi,
Kazuaki Matsumoto

摘要

Objectives

It is recommended to adjust the dose of vancomycin (VCM) with a target area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of 400–600 μg·h/mL. Factors that affect the deviation between AUCs are estimated from the trough value alone and the trough and peak values using practical AUC-guided therapeutic drug monitoring (PAT) for vancomycin. In this study, factors that affect AUC were evaluated.

Methods

AUCs were estimated from a single trough value and trough and peak values, and the patients were classified into those who showed a 10% or greater deviation (deviation group) and those in whom the deviation was less than 10% (no-deviation group). Risk factors related to ≥ 10% deviation of AUC were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

As a result of univariate and multivariate analysis of 30 patients in the deviation group and 344 patients in the no-deviation group, a creatinine clearance (CLcr) of ≥ 110 mL/min (odds ratio (OR) = 3.697, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.616–8.457, p = 0.002), heart failure with a brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) of ≥ 300 pg/mL (OR = 4.854, 95%CI = 1.199–19.656, p = 0.027), and the concomitant use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACE-I/ARB) (OR = 2.544, 95%CI = 1.074–6.024, p = 0.034) were identified as risk factors of ≥ 10% deviation of AUC.

Conclusions

Estimation of AUC by two-point blood sampling for the trough and peak values rather than one-point blood sampling for the trough value is suggested to improve the prediction accuracy in patients with enhanced renal function, severe heart failure, and patients using ACE-I/ARB.