<p>Coupling oxide catalysts with plasma discharges has emerged as a highly effective strategy to enhance the efficiency of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-based nitrogen fixation. However, the fundamental mechanisms by which oxide catalysts promote <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation in plasma-assisted processes remain poorly understood. In this paper, several common oxides were investigated to evaluate their influence on <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation efficiency under atmospheric DC glow plasma. The term “catalyst” is used here in a broader sense to describe oxides that participate in plasma-assisted surface reactions, rather than conventional promotion of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation. By combining XPS, FTIR, and TPD characterizations, the role of oxide catalysts in plasma <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> production was explored. All oxide catalysts were found to enhance <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> production, with the maximum production rate increasing by up to 25%. In parallel, the lowest energy cost decreased by around 10%, reaching a minimum of 4.5 MJ/mol. Notably, <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> production is more significantly affected by oxides, accounting for up to 90% of the overall increase in <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> production. XPS and FTIR analyses reveal the formation of nitrate (<InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathrm {NO_3^-}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) or nitrite (<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathrm {NO_2^-}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) on all oxides except <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {SiO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> after discharge, while TPD results confirm the <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> adsorption and storage capabilities for all oxides used in this experiment. Low-oxygen concentration discharge experiments indicate that direct <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation on oxide surfaces is negligible, whereas the <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> production varies significantly among different oxides. These findings suggest a possible “<InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> adsorption–oxidation–desorption” cycle occurring on oxide catalysts during plasma-assisted <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation. In particular, the catalytic oxidation of NO to <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_2\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is proposed to facilitate the progression of nitrogen fixation and contribute to improved energy efficiency. Further thermal desorption analysis of CuO after discharge and TPD results demonstrate that effective <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> desorption is a key step in the enhancement provided by oxides. Although elevated temperatures favor <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> desorption, they also suppress NO oxidation, thereby limiting the improvement in <InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\text {NO}_x\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> formation efficiency by oxides.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Mechanisms of Oxide-Catalyst-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation via \(\text {NO}_x\) Formation in Glow Discharges

  • Yiheng Li,
  • Yi Luo,
  • Chenxi Man,
  • Xuekai Pei

摘要

Coupling oxide catalysts with plasma discharges has emerged as a highly effective strategy to enhance the efficiency of \(\text {NO}_x\) -based nitrogen fixation. However, the fundamental mechanisms by which oxide catalysts promote \(\text {NO}_x\) formation in plasma-assisted processes remain poorly understood. In this paper, several common oxides were investigated to evaluate their influence on \(\text {NO}_x\) formation efficiency under atmospheric DC glow plasma. The term “catalyst” is used here in a broader sense to describe oxides that participate in plasma-assisted surface reactions, rather than conventional promotion of \(\text {NO}_x\) formation. By combining XPS, FTIR, and TPD characterizations, the role of oxide catalysts in plasma \(\text {NO}_x\) production was explored. All oxide catalysts were found to enhance \(\text {NO}_x\) production, with the maximum production rate increasing by up to 25%. In parallel, the lowest energy cost decreased by around 10%, reaching a minimum of 4.5 MJ/mol. Notably, \(\text {NO}_2\) production is more significantly affected by oxides, accounting for up to 90% of the overall increase in \(\text {NO}_x\) production. XPS and FTIR analyses reveal the formation of nitrate ( \(\mathrm {NO_3^-}\) ) or nitrite ( \(\mathrm {NO_2^-}\) ) on all oxides except \(\text {SiO}_2\) after discharge, while TPD results confirm the \(\text {NO}_x\) adsorption and storage capabilities for all oxides used in this experiment. Low-oxygen concentration discharge experiments indicate that direct \(\text {NO}_x\) formation on oxide surfaces is negligible, whereas the \(\text {NO}_2\) production varies significantly among different oxides. These findings suggest a possible “ \(\text {NO}_x\) adsorption–oxidation–desorption” cycle occurring on oxide catalysts during plasma-assisted \(\text {NO}_x\) formation. In particular, the catalytic oxidation of NO to \(\text {NO}_2\) is proposed to facilitate the progression of nitrogen fixation and contribute to improved energy efficiency. Further thermal desorption analysis of CuO after discharge and TPD results demonstrate that effective \(\text {NO}_x\) desorption is a key step in the enhancement provided by oxides. Although elevated temperatures favor \(\text {NO}_x\) desorption, they also suppress NO oxidation, thereby limiting the improvement in \(\text {NO}_x\) formation efficiency by oxides.