<p>This article explores the conceptualization of emotional intelligence (EI) pertaining to clergy, highlighting its critical role in fostering both personal wellbeing and ministerial effectiveness. While EI has been increasingly examined in clergy studies, the article critiques the commonly utilized Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale (SEIS) as inadequate for assessing clergy EI given the particularities of their role(s) and context. The SEIS overlooks the vocational, theological, and relational dimensions of ministry, which shape clergy self-understanding and their emotional experiences. Clergy operate within a distinct emotional ecology, where the demands of pastoral care, theological commitments, and communal service create a unique emotional landscape. The article calls for the development of contextually relevant EI measures that consider the relational and sacramental nature of the clergy role, advocating for a more ecologically valid framework to assess clergy EI and therefrom EI development to enhance clergy resilience and effectiveness in ministry.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conceptualizing the Emotional Intelligence of Clergy

  • Neville John Emslie

摘要

This article explores the conceptualization of emotional intelligence (EI) pertaining to clergy, highlighting its critical role in fostering both personal wellbeing and ministerial effectiveness. While EI has been increasingly examined in clergy studies, the article critiques the commonly utilized Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale (SEIS) as inadequate for assessing clergy EI given the particularities of their role(s) and context. The SEIS overlooks the vocational, theological, and relational dimensions of ministry, which shape clergy self-understanding and their emotional experiences. Clergy operate within a distinct emotional ecology, where the demands of pastoral care, theological commitments, and communal service create a unique emotional landscape. The article calls for the development of contextually relevant EI measures that consider the relational and sacramental nature of the clergy role, advocating for a more ecologically valid framework to assess clergy EI and therefrom EI development to enhance clergy resilience and effectiveness in ministry.