错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multimodal treatment of glioblastoma with multiple lesions - a multi-center retrospective analysis

  • Harald Krenzlin,
  • Dragan Jankovic,
  • Alice Dauth,
  • Felipa Lange,
  • Martin Wetzel,
  • Leon Schmidt,
  • Insa Janssen,
  • Christoph Richter,
  • Marcus Stockinger,
  • Heinz Schmidberger,
  • Marc A. Brockmann,
  • Clemens Sommer,
  • Bernhard Meyer,
  • Naureen Keric,
  • Florian Ringel

摘要

Objective

The presence of multiple localizations (ML) in glioblastoma is rare and associated with perceived poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a multimodal treatment on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in ML glioblastoma.

Methods

Patients presenting with CNS WHO grade 4 glioblastoma with ML to 2 major German Departments of Neurosurgery between January 1st, 2008, to December 31st, 2020 were included in this study. Primary outcome parameters were extent of resection (EOR) using the 2021 RANO criteria, progression free- and overall survival.

Results

A total of 483 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (CNS WHO grade 4) were assessed. 134 patients presented with ML (72 multifocal (MF), 62 multicentric (MC)). The median PFS and OS did not differ among MC and MF glioblastomas. The EOR was a significant predictor of PFS and OS in ML glioblastoma. complete-, near total-, and subtotal resection significantly prolonged PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001) compared to biopsy alone. Standard radiotherapy (p = 0.045) and hypofractionated (p < 0.0001) radiotherapy and adjuvant treatment (Stupp protocol) prolonged PFS (p = 0.0012) and OS (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis Karnfosky performance score, EOR, and concomitant adjuvant treatment remained significant factors influencing OS. Propensity score matching of patients with ML and solitary lesion tumors showed similar PFS and OS (p = 0.08).

Conclusion

The presented data suggests that glioblastomas with multiple lesions treated with multimodal therapy equal survival rates compared to patients with solitary lesion tumors can be achieved. The results reflect the importance of an equally aggressive maximal treatment effort in this particular and often marginalized group of patients.