<p>Outward-sensitive, phonologically conditioned suppletive allomorphy (OS-PCSA) has been argued not to occur (Bobaljik <CitationRef CitationID="CR9">2000</CitationRef>; Paster <CitationRef CitationID="CR50">2006</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR51">2009</CitationRef>). Telugu (Dravidian) displays apparent OS-PCSA. Rather than loosen the root-out condition (Deal and Wolf <CitationRef CitationID="CR16">2017</CitationRef>) or move Vocabulary Insertion into the phonology (Anderson <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2011</CitationRef>, Brodkin 2025), I present a purely phonological solution. The alternation is due to the interaction of an inherently stressed exponent with stress faithfulness and foot binarity constraints in Stratal OT (Kiparsky <CitationRef CitationID="CR36">2000</CitationRef>). The analytical “moral of the story”: in at least one case, which looks on the surface like OS-PCSA, the pattern can instead be analyzed as pure phonology; what at first looks like a counterexample is instead the exception that proves the rule.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The nouns that say -ni: Morpheme-specific phonology in Telugu

  • Akshay Aitha

摘要

Outward-sensitive, phonologically conditioned suppletive allomorphy (OS-PCSA) has been argued not to occur (Bobaljik 2000; Paster 2006, 2009). Telugu (Dravidian) displays apparent OS-PCSA. Rather than loosen the root-out condition (Deal and Wolf 2017) or move Vocabulary Insertion into the phonology (Anderson 2011, Brodkin 2025), I present a purely phonological solution. The alternation is due to the interaction of an inherently stressed exponent with stress faithfulness and foot binarity constraints in Stratal OT (Kiparsky 2000). The analytical “moral of the story”: in at least one case, which looks on the surface like OS-PCSA, the pattern can instead be analyzed as pure phonology; what at first looks like a counterexample is instead the exception that proves the rule.