A novel architecture for pseudo-incorporation
摘要
Pseudo-noun incorporation (PI), typically characterized by a theme NP that is adjacent to the verb and lacks case-marking, is recognized as a phenomenon distinct from noun incorporation, with unique morpho-syntactic and semantic properties that also set it apart from canonical argumentation. This paper explores a lesser-studied variant of PI involving agent arguments, which requires a surface word order that reverses the universal thematic hierarchy. This reversal raises questions about its impact on two crosslinguistic reflections of transitive syntax: accusative case and ϕ-agreement with objects. Through an empirical investigation of Turkish and Laz, we demonstrate that the case and agreement patterns in clauses with agent PI are identical to those where the agent is not incorporated. Given the view that the incorporated agent is merged lower than the theme argument (Öztürk