<p>This systematic review aims to identify the metagenomic methodological approaches employed for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in swine wastewater treatment systems. The search terms used were metagenome AND bacteria AND (“antimicrobial resistance gene” OR resistome OR ARG) AND wastewater AND (swine OR pig), and the search was conducted across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to studies published between 2020 and 2024. Of the 220 studies retrieved, eight met the eligibility criteria for full-text analysis. The number of publications in this research area has increased in recent years, with China contributing the highest number of studies. ARGs are typically identified using bioinformatics pipelines that include steps such as quality trimming, assembly, metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) reconstruction, open reading frame (ORF) prediction, and ARG annotation. However, comparing ARGs quantification across studies remains challenging due to methodological differences and variability in quantification approaches. Therefore, this systematic review highlights the need for methodological standardization to facilitate comparison and enhance our understanding of antimicrobial resistance in swine wastewater treatment systems through metagenomic approaches.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Metagenomic approaches for the quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater treatment system: a systematic review

  • Mariana Costa Torres,
  • Gabriela Merker Breyer,
  • Maria Eduarda Rocha Jacques da Silva,
  • Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema Cardoso,
  • Franciele Maboni Siqueira

摘要

This systematic review aims to identify the metagenomic methodological approaches employed for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in swine wastewater treatment systems. The search terms used were metagenome AND bacteria AND (“antimicrobial resistance gene” OR resistome OR ARG) AND wastewater AND (swine OR pig), and the search was conducted across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to studies published between 2020 and 2024. Of the 220 studies retrieved, eight met the eligibility criteria for full-text analysis. The number of publications in this research area has increased in recent years, with China contributing the highest number of studies. ARGs are typically identified using bioinformatics pipelines that include steps such as quality trimming, assembly, metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) reconstruction, open reading frame (ORF) prediction, and ARG annotation. However, comparing ARGs quantification across studies remains challenging due to methodological differences and variability in quantification approaches. Therefore, this systematic review highlights the need for methodological standardization to facilitate comparison and enhance our understanding of antimicrobial resistance in swine wastewater treatment systems through metagenomic approaches.