<p>This paper responds to Paula Sweeney’s characterization of avatars as proxies, proposing instead a framework that treats avatars as genuine parts of “hybrid persons.” Adopting a four-dimensionalist metaphysics, I argue that persons should be understood as maximal aggregates of both biological and virtual temporal parts. This approach reconceptualizes the relationship between users and their avatars as analogous to the relationship between present and past selves rather than as a proxy relationship between separate entities. While Sweeney identifies an “epistemic gap” in avatar-user relationships as problematic for responsibility attribution, I argue that this gap is not unique to virtual contexts but appears in ordinary cases of personal identity over time. The real challenge stems from what I term the “consciousness gap” - our inability to directly experience our avatar’s actions. Drawing on Parfit’s insights about the unimportance of identity in the survival of persons, I show a way to attribute responsibility across such gaps. To address potential challenges to my framework similar to Johnston’s personite problem, I adopt a priority perdurantist solution to persons, treating both biological and virtual parts as metaphysically derivative from the hybrid person.</p>