Scholarlink

<p>Medicine has persisted for thousands of years despite frequent therapeutic failures. What explains its persistence despite its failure to cure? I contend that the Inquiry thesis’s view – seeing medicine’s “core business” as prediction and understanding – rests on an unhelpful conceptual distinction between <i>main goal</i> and <i>core business</i>, along with an implausible “No Bullshit” premise. Instead, I support the refined Curative Thesis (RCT): medicine is united by a teleological (<i>constitutive</i>) aim to help the sick through socially organised and accountable interventions, even when cures are uncertain. Using conceptual analysis and analogies from comedy, mining, and policing, I demonstrate that professions can survive repeated failures in their main goals, revealing a symmetry: prediction and explanation often fail as well. This work is innovative in three ways: it discards “core business” as a defining tool, introduces a teleological boundary that accommodates epistemic diversity, and redefines prediction and understanding as instrumental goods intrinsic to medicine. It also relates RCT to other recent curative-focused and related accounts, such as Smart (Synthese 201(6):194, 2023); Varga (Science, medicine, and the aims of inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2024); Stegenga (Care and cure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2018), clarifying their significance.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Cure as medicine’s constitutive aim: a defence of the refined curative thesis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月11日

查看全文
  • Likhwa Ncube

摘要

Medicine has persisted for thousands of years despite frequent therapeutic failures. What explains its persistence despite its failure to cure? I contend that the Inquiry thesis’s view – seeing medicine’s “core business” as prediction and understanding – rests on an unhelpful conceptual distinction between main goal and core business, along with an implausible “No Bullshit” premise. Instead, I support the refined Curative Thesis (RCT): medicine is united by a teleological (constitutive) aim to help the sick through socially organised and accountable interventions, even when cures are uncertain. Using conceptual analysis and analogies from comedy, mining, and policing, I demonstrate that professions can survive repeated failures in their main goals, revealing a symmetry: prediction and explanation often fail as well. This work is innovative in three ways: it discards “core business” as a defining tool, introduces a teleological boundary that accommodates epistemic diversity, and redefines prediction and understanding as instrumental goods intrinsic to medicine. It also relates RCT to other recent curative-focused and related accounts, such as Smart (Synthese 201(6):194, 2023); Varga (Science, medicine, and the aims of inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2024); Stegenga (Care and cure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2018), clarifying their significance.