Scholarlink

<p>Social connection is a core determinant of mental and physical health, and connection-oriented services (e.g. peer programmes, groups, and social prescribing) are increasingly implemented. Yet social connection is culturally patterned. When participants’ interaction styles align with a service’s implicit organisational norms, belonging may be easier to achieve; when they do not, cultural mismatch may reduce recognition, constrain participation, and intensify loneliness, leaving some participants feeling more disconnected. This paper operationalises organisational norms around participation and help-seeking using three sociological elements (symbols, values, and norms), and proposes a brief reflective audit that can be embedded in routine quality improvement. The audit is intended to help services make implicit rules of engagement more visible (e.g. expectations around disclosure, turn-taking, help-seeking, disagreement, and what counts as “good participation”), and identify which interaction styles are more readily recognised versus under-supported. Two possible outputs are proposed: (1) a participant-facing, plain-language participation brief that may improve clarity about how participation works; and (2) an internal action plan intended to widen routes to connection (e.g. structured turn-taking, opt-in written or one-to-one routes, small-group formats, and facilitator prompts validating quiet participation). Making organisational norms more explicit may offer a practical reflective approach to strengthen inclusivity by design in connection-focused services.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Culture as Guidance in Social Connection Services: A Symbol–Value–Norm Framework for Reflecting on Organisational Norms

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月16日

查看全文
  • Yasuhiro Kotera

摘要

Social connection is a core determinant of mental and physical health, and connection-oriented services (e.g. peer programmes, groups, and social prescribing) are increasingly implemented. Yet social connection is culturally patterned. When participants’ interaction styles align with a service’s implicit organisational norms, belonging may be easier to achieve; when they do not, cultural mismatch may reduce recognition, constrain participation, and intensify loneliness, leaving some participants feeling more disconnected. This paper operationalises organisational norms around participation and help-seeking using three sociological elements (symbols, values, and norms), and proposes a brief reflective audit that can be embedded in routine quality improvement. The audit is intended to help services make implicit rules of engagement more visible (e.g. expectations around disclosure, turn-taking, help-seeking, disagreement, and what counts as “good participation”), and identify which interaction styles are more readily recognised versus under-supported. Two possible outputs are proposed: (1) a participant-facing, plain-language participation brief that may improve clarity about how participation works; and (2) an internal action plan intended to widen routes to connection (e.g. structured turn-taking, opt-in written or one-to-one routes, small-group formats, and facilitator prompts validating quiet participation). Making organisational norms more explicit may offer a practical reflective approach to strengthen inclusivity by design in connection-focused services.