<p>This article examines how intergenerational memory shapes clinicians’ moral experience and empathic engagement in everyday clinical practice. Drawing on a reflexive account of a routine medical encounter that unexpectedly activated inherited histories of war, displacement, and fear, the essay is situated within anthropological and medical humanities scholarship on clinician subjectivation, postmemory, and moral experience. While existing literature has examined how professional training and institutional norms shape clinicians’ subjectivities, less attention has been paid to how pre-professional, intergenerational histories of trauma enter clinical encounters and quietly inform ethical perception. By engaging concepts from psychological anthropology and narrative medicine, this article argues that clinicians’ inherited affective histories are not extraneous to care but constitutive of moral judgment and empathic response. Attending to these dimensions of subjectivity is not antithetical to professionalism but central to reflective and ethically attentive clinical practice.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Past in the Exam Room: Intergenerational Memory, Moral Ambiguity, and the Work of Empathy

  • Dominika Jegen

摘要

This article examines how intergenerational memory shapes clinicians’ moral experience and empathic engagement in everyday clinical practice. Drawing on a reflexive account of a routine medical encounter that unexpectedly activated inherited histories of war, displacement, and fear, the essay is situated within anthropological and medical humanities scholarship on clinician subjectivation, postmemory, and moral experience. While existing literature has examined how professional training and institutional norms shape clinicians’ subjectivities, less attention has been paid to how pre-professional, intergenerational histories of trauma enter clinical encounters and quietly inform ethical perception. By engaging concepts from psychological anthropology and narrative medicine, this article argues that clinicians’ inherited affective histories are not extraneous to care but constitutive of moral judgment and empathic response. Attending to these dimensions of subjectivity is not antithetical to professionalism but central to reflective and ethically attentive clinical practice.