Scholarlink

<p>The global mental health movement has brought much-needed attention to the vast burden of mental illness worldwide, yet its overwhelming reliance on Western psychiatric models has generated critical debate regarding cultural relevance and effectiveness. This commentary examines the limitations of exporting Western diagnostic categories and treatments to diverse settings, highlighting the risks of cultural mismatch, medicalization of social suffering, and marginalization of indigenous healing systems. Drawing on recent evidence from task-shifting, community-based interventions, and hybrid models, we demonstrate that locally grounded approaches such as Zimbabwe’s friendship bench and collaborative programs between traditional and biomedical practitioners can be highly effective, culturally resonant, and sustainable. However, the unchecked predominance of Western paradigms has sometimes led to increased stigma, over-reliance on pharmaceuticals, and the erosion of community trust. To address these challenges, this paper&#xa0;recommend a pluralistic and participatory approach to global mental health, emphasizing culturally adapted care, local leadership, equitable research funding, and respectful integration of multiple healing traditions. The future of global mental health depends on humility, partnership, and a commitment to social justice, ensuring that mental health services are not only scientifically sound but also meaningful and accessible to all communities. Achieving effective and equitable mental health care globally requires moving beyond Western models to embrace pluralism, cultural adaptation, community engagement, local leadership, and equity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Embracing Pluralism: Rethinking Western Psychiatric Models for Equitable Global Mental Health

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月7日

查看全文
  • Augustus Osborne

摘要

The global mental health movement has brought much-needed attention to the vast burden of mental illness worldwide, yet its overwhelming reliance on Western psychiatric models has generated critical debate regarding cultural relevance and effectiveness. This commentary examines the limitations of exporting Western diagnostic categories and treatments to diverse settings, highlighting the risks of cultural mismatch, medicalization of social suffering, and marginalization of indigenous healing systems. Drawing on recent evidence from task-shifting, community-based interventions, and hybrid models, we demonstrate that locally grounded approaches such as Zimbabwe’s friendship bench and collaborative programs between traditional and biomedical practitioners can be highly effective, culturally resonant, and sustainable. However, the unchecked predominance of Western paradigms has sometimes led to increased stigma, over-reliance on pharmaceuticals, and the erosion of community trust. To address these challenges, this paper recommend a pluralistic and participatory approach to global mental health, emphasizing culturally adapted care, local leadership, equitable research funding, and respectful integration of multiple healing traditions. The future of global mental health depends on humility, partnership, and a commitment to social justice, ensuring that mental health services are not only scientifically sound but also meaningful and accessible to all communities. Achieving effective and equitable mental health care globally requires moving beyond Western models to embrace pluralism, cultural adaptation, community engagement, local leadership, and equity.