<p>This paper argues that Jean Bodin’s account of property provides a useful framework for understanding environmental commons. Against traditions that treat property as a prepolitical and individual right, Bodin conceives ownership as a politically constituted and relational institution embedded within the commonwealth. On this view, property, sovereignty, and the common good are intrinsically connected. The paper first reconstructs Bodin’s account of property and highlights its distinctive features in contrast to liberal theories of ownership. It then argues that both private-property and commons-based approaches face conceptual limitations in addressing environmental goods. Building on Bodin’s account, the paper develops a framework for environmental commons based on three interconnected dimensions: individual use rights, collective ecological interests, and political stewardship. The contribution of the paper is to show that environmental stewardship can be understood as arising from the political foundations of property itself rather than as an external restriction imposed upon ownership. While Bodin does not offer a theory of environmental governance, his conception of property provides important conceptual resources for rethinking the relationship between ownership, collective welfare, and ecological responsibility.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Jean Bodin’s Account of Property and the Environmental Commons

  • Jingduo Hu

摘要

This paper argues that Jean Bodin’s account of property provides a useful framework for understanding environmental commons. Against traditions that treat property as a prepolitical and individual right, Bodin conceives ownership as a politically constituted and relational institution embedded within the commonwealth. On this view, property, sovereignty, and the common good are intrinsically connected. The paper first reconstructs Bodin’s account of property and highlights its distinctive features in contrast to liberal theories of ownership. It then argues that both private-property and commons-based approaches face conceptual limitations in addressing environmental goods. Building on Bodin’s account, the paper develops a framework for environmental commons based on three interconnected dimensions: individual use rights, collective ecological interests, and political stewardship. The contribution of the paper is to show that environmental stewardship can be understood as arising from the political foundations of property itself rather than as an external restriction imposed upon ownership. While Bodin does not offer a theory of environmental governance, his conception of property provides important conceptual resources for rethinking the relationship between ownership, collective welfare, and ecological responsibility.