Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Antimicrobial peptides show promise as broad-spectrum agents and are less likely to induce rapid resistance. However, protease sensitivity limits their potential as antibiotic alternatives. Non-canonical amino acid incorporation may enhance stability but could impact other properties.</p> Methods <p>The activities of four peptides (oligoarginine (PLR10), oligohomoarginine (PLHR10), Mel4, and Mel4HArg) were tested against strains of <i>S. aureus</i>,<i> P. aeruginosa</i> and <i>E. coli.</i> Circular dichroism (CD) was used to determine their secondary structure. Their MICs against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were re-examined after protease treatment. Cytotoxicities against L929 cell line were determined.</p> Results <p>MICs for the four AMPs ranged from 31.25 to &gt; 500 µM. Total substitution of arginine with homoarginine had minimal effect on MICs of PLR10, but increased the MICs of Mel4, e.g., against <i>S. aureus</i> ATCC 6538 from 31.25 to &gt; 250 µM. In 30 mM SDS, substitution with homoarginine resulted in the loss of α-helical structures. Trypsin reduced PLR10 activity against <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> but had less effect on PLHR10. At 62.5 µM, PLR10 reduced <i>E. coli</i> growth by 20% compared to 90% for PLHR10. At 125 µM, PLR10 reduced <i>P. aeruginosa</i> growth by 22% compared to 70% for PLHR10. Mel4HArg retained activity against <i>E. coli</i> post-trypsin treatment but not against <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. The IC<sub>50</sub> for PLR10 and PLHR10 (15.625 µM) against L929 cell line was below their MIC (31.25 µM), indicating low therapeutic potential. In contrast, Mel4 and Mel4HArg had IC50 &gt; 500 µM, exceeding Mel4’s MIC for <i>S. aureus</i> (31.25–62.5 µM) and <i>E. coli</i> (125 µM), though not for Mel4HArg’s MIC against <i>P. aeruginosa</i>.</p> Conclusion <p>The total arginine substitution with homoarginine in Mel4 and PLR10 resulted in improved stability but reduced activity in Mel4 and no improvement in cytotoxicity of PLR10, highlighting the need to find balance in optimizing AMP properties.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessing the Effect of Substitution of Arginine with Homoarginine in Two Antimicrobial Peptides

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月22日

查看全文
  • George Nkrumah Enninful,
  • Rajesh Kuppusamy,
  • Elvis Tiburu,
  • Naresh Kumar,
  • Mark D. P. Willcox

摘要

Purpose

Antimicrobial peptides show promise as broad-spectrum agents and are less likely to induce rapid resistance. However, protease sensitivity limits their potential as antibiotic alternatives. Non-canonical amino acid incorporation may enhance stability but could impact other properties.

Methods

The activities of four peptides (oligoarginine (PLR10), oligohomoarginine (PLHR10), Mel4, and Mel4HArg) were tested against strains of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Circular dichroism (CD) was used to determine their secondary structure. Their MICs against E. coli and P. aeruginosa were re-examined after protease treatment. Cytotoxicities against L929 cell line were determined.

Results

MICs for the four AMPs ranged from 31.25 to > 500 µM. Total substitution of arginine with homoarginine had minimal effect on MICs of PLR10, but increased the MICs of Mel4, e.g., against S. aureus ATCC 6538 from 31.25 to > 250 µM. In 30 mM SDS, substitution with homoarginine resulted in the loss of α-helical structures. Trypsin reduced PLR10 activity against E. coli and P. aeruginosa but had less effect on PLHR10. At 62.5 µM, PLR10 reduced E. coli growth by 20% compared to 90% for PLHR10. At 125 µM, PLR10 reduced P. aeruginosa growth by 22% compared to 70% for PLHR10. Mel4HArg retained activity against E. coli post-trypsin treatment but not against P. aeruginosa. The IC50 for PLR10 and PLHR10 (15.625 µM) against L929 cell line was below their MIC (31.25 µM), indicating low therapeutic potential. In contrast, Mel4 and Mel4HArg had IC50 > 500 µM, exceeding Mel4’s MIC for S. aureus (31.25–62.5 µM) and E. coli (125 µM), though not for Mel4HArg’s MIC against P. aeruginosa.

Conclusion

The total arginine substitution with homoarginine in Mel4 and PLR10 resulted in improved stability but reduced activity in Mel4 and no improvement in cytotoxicity of PLR10, highlighting the need to find balance in optimizing AMP properties.