Scholarlink

<p>Certain cases of open texture pose a problem for theories of meaning that assign extensions to terms (relative to worlds and contexts). This paper proposes a theory of meaning that accommodates open texture and does not assign extensions. I will argue that the word “plant” exhibits the problematic kind of open texture in light of the discovery in the 1960’s that fungi are not plants. The alternative theory of meaning that I will defend holds that when one makes a statement about the meaning of a linguistic expression, one is making a proposal about how the expression should be used. The rejection of extension-involving theories of meaning challenges us to formulate a semantic theory that allows us to define logical properties but which does not assign extensions. This challenge can be met by means of a semantic theory that formulates conditions under which sentences are <i>acceptable in a context</i>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Meaning-proposals

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月28日

查看全文
  • Christopher Gauker

摘要

Certain cases of open texture pose a problem for theories of meaning that assign extensions to terms (relative to worlds and contexts). This paper proposes a theory of meaning that accommodates open texture and does not assign extensions. I will argue that the word “plant” exhibits the problematic kind of open texture in light of the discovery in the 1960’s that fungi are not plants. The alternative theory of meaning that I will defend holds that when one makes a statement about the meaning of a linguistic expression, one is making a proposal about how the expression should be used. The rejection of extension-involving theories of meaning challenges us to formulate a semantic theory that allows us to define logical properties but which does not assign extensions. This challenge can be met by means of a semantic theory that formulates conditions under which sentences are acceptable in a context.