Scholarlink

<p>This comment examines&#xa0;<i>Reasonableness and Risk</i>'s pluralist account of strict liability, based on sovereignty rights and fairness. It begins by explaining the book's cogent arguments for some strict liability, and elaborates on how they might further be strengthened. More critically, it suggests that it is unclear why the book rejects more wide-ranging wrongs-based strict liability, and that its fairness justification needs further refinement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Liability and Fault in Reasonableness and Risk

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月15日

查看全文
  • Sandy Steel

摘要

This comment examines Reasonableness and Risk's pluralist account of strict liability, based on sovereignty rights and fairness. It begins by explaining the book's cogent arguments for some strict liability, and elaborates on how they might further be strengthened. More critically, it suggests that it is unclear why the book rejects more wide-ranging wrongs-based strict liability, and that its fairness justification needs further refinement.