Scholarlink

Context <p>Cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, including bees and wasps, provide essential ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control in agricultural landscapes. However, their populations are increasingly threatened by habitat loss, landscape simplification and agricultural intensification. As a result, conservation measures aimed at restoring semi-natural habitats and enhancing landscape heterogeneity have been widely implemented in agricultural regions, yet their effectiveness at the landscape scale remains insufficiently understood for cavity-nesting species.</p> Objectives <p>We examined how conservation context, semi-natural habitat cover and edge density affect occupancy, species richness, reproductive performance and parasitism of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in an agriculturally dominated landscape.</p> Methods <p>In the Günz Valley (southern Germany), we deployed trap-nests at 16 extensively managed meadows using a paired design comparing sites embedded within landscapes dominated by conservation-managed habitats (core areas, CAs) with comparable nearby meadows in conventionally managed landscapes (non-core areas, non-CAs). We quantified the effects of conservation context, semi-natural habitat cover and edge density on Hymenoptera occupancy, bee and wasp species richness, reproductive performance of <i>Osmia bicornis</i>, and parasitism by <i>Melittobia</i> spp.</p> Results <p>Overall Hymenoptera occupancy did not differ between CAs and non-CAs but showed strong context dependency: occupancy increased with semi-natural habitat cover in non-CAs, whereas no relationship was detected within CAs. Wasp species richness was higher in CAs, while bee species richness did not differ between conservation contexts. Reproductive output of <i>O. bicornis</i> increased with semi-natural habitat cover across both contexts, and brood survival increased with edge density. Parasitism by <i>Melittobia</i> spp. increased with host availability and tended to be higher in non-CAs.</p> Conclusions <p>Semi-natural habitats and ecotones play key roles in supporting occupancy and reproductive performance of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Conservation clustering alone did not uniformly enhance bee responses but may buffer density-dependent parasitism. Effective conservation strategies should prioritise maintaining semi-natural habitats and structurally heterogeneous landscapes while considering trophic interactions that may influence reproductive success.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Semi-natural habitat cover, edge density and landscape conservation context shape the occupancy, species richness and reproductive performance of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in an agricultural landscape

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月9日

查看全文
  • Christopher Wild,
  • Julia Zelychenko,
  • Sebastian Hopfenmüller,
  • Robert J. Paxton,
  • Panagiotis Theodorou

摘要

Context

Cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, including bees and wasps, provide essential ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control in agricultural landscapes. However, their populations are increasingly threatened by habitat loss, landscape simplification and agricultural intensification. As a result, conservation measures aimed at restoring semi-natural habitats and enhancing landscape heterogeneity have been widely implemented in agricultural regions, yet their effectiveness at the landscape scale remains insufficiently understood for cavity-nesting species.

Objectives

We examined how conservation context, semi-natural habitat cover and edge density affect occupancy, species richness, reproductive performance and parasitism of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in an agriculturally dominated landscape.

Methods

In the Günz Valley (southern Germany), we deployed trap-nests at 16 extensively managed meadows using a paired design comparing sites embedded within landscapes dominated by conservation-managed habitats (core areas, CAs) with comparable nearby meadows in conventionally managed landscapes (non-core areas, non-CAs). We quantified the effects of conservation context, semi-natural habitat cover and edge density on Hymenoptera occupancy, bee and wasp species richness, reproductive performance of Osmia bicornis, and parasitism by Melittobia spp.

Results

Overall Hymenoptera occupancy did not differ between CAs and non-CAs but showed strong context dependency: occupancy increased with semi-natural habitat cover in non-CAs, whereas no relationship was detected within CAs. Wasp species richness was higher in CAs, while bee species richness did not differ between conservation contexts. Reproductive output of O. bicornis increased with semi-natural habitat cover across both contexts, and brood survival increased with edge density. Parasitism by Melittobia spp. increased with host availability and tended to be higher in non-CAs.

Conclusions

Semi-natural habitats and ecotones play key roles in supporting occupancy and reproductive performance of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera, particularly in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Conservation clustering alone did not uniformly enhance bee responses but may buffer density-dependent parasitism. Effective conservation strategies should prioritise maintaining semi-natural habitats and structurally heterogeneous landscapes while considering trophic interactions that may influence reproductive success.