Context <p>There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS.</p> Objectives <p>To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments.</p> Methods <p>We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features.</p> Results <p>We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors’ diverse values.</p> Conclusions <p>Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Landscapes—a lens for assessing sustainability

  • Marie C. Dade,
  • Aletta Bonn,
  • Felix Eigenbrod,
  • María R. Felipe-Lucia,
  • Brendan Fisher,
  • Benjamin Goldstein,
  • Robert A. Holland,
  • Kelly A. Hopping,
  • Sandra Lavorel,
  • Yann le Polain de Waroux,
  • Graham K. MacDonald,
  • Lisa Mandle,
  • Jean Paul Metzger,
  • Unai Pascual,
  • Jesse T. Rieb,
  • Améline Vallet,
  • Geoff J. Wells,
  • Carly D. Ziter,
  • Elena M. Bennett,
  • Brian E. Robinson

摘要

Context

There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS.

Objectives

To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments.

Methods

We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features.

Results

We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors’ diverse values.

Conclusions

Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.