<p>Garnet-structured oxides have emerged as compelling candidates in the realm of energy storage due to their crystallographic resilience and compositional versatility. This investigation delves into the dielectric and conduction behavior of two sol–gel-derived cubic garnets—Gd<sub>3</sub>Ce<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (GCAG) and Gd<sub>3</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub>Al<sub>3</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (GFAG) sintered at 1100 °C and 950 °C, respectively. Phase purity and microstructural coherence were validated via Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. At 30 °C, GCAG exhibited a DC conductivity of 2.66 × 10<sup>–</sup><sup>5</sup> S·m<sup>–1</sup>, while GFAG registered 1.80 × 10<sup>–5</sup> S·m<sup>–1</sup>. Thermally activated conduction regimes—diffusion, activation, and ionization—were quantified through Arrhenius analysis, yielding activation energies of 0.65 eV, 0.60 eV, and 0.58 eV for GCAG, and 0.47 eV, 0.45 eV, and 0.43 eV for GFAG. Dielectric spectroscopy revealed non-Debye relaxation dynamics, indicative of spatially heterogeneous polarization processes. Impedance analysis further resolved distinct contributions from grains and grain boundaries, elucidating the multiscale transport phenomena intrinsic to these garnet matrices. Collectively, the findings underscore the functional potential of GCAG and GFAG in next-generation energy conversion and storage devices.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Sol-gel derived Gd3R2Al3O12 (R = Ce, Fe) garnets: microstructural, dielectric, and impedance analysis

  • Dewasthali Tejaswi Ramchandra,
  • Suman Rani

摘要

Garnet-structured oxides have emerged as compelling candidates in the realm of energy storage due to their crystallographic resilience and compositional versatility. This investigation delves into the dielectric and conduction behavior of two sol–gel-derived cubic garnets—Gd3Ce2Al3O12 (GCAG) and Gd3Fe2Al3O12 (GFAG) sintered at 1100 °C and 950 °C, respectively. Phase purity and microstructural coherence were validated via Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. At 30 °C, GCAG exhibited a DC conductivity of 2.66 × 105 S·m–1, while GFAG registered 1.80 × 10–5 S·m–1. Thermally activated conduction regimes—diffusion, activation, and ionization—were quantified through Arrhenius analysis, yielding activation energies of 0.65 eV, 0.60 eV, and 0.58 eV for GCAG, and 0.47 eV, 0.45 eV, and 0.43 eV for GFAG. Dielectric spectroscopy revealed non-Debye relaxation dynamics, indicative of spatially heterogeneous polarization processes. Impedance analysis further resolved distinct contributions from grains and grain boundaries, elucidating the multiscale transport phenomena intrinsic to these garnet matrices. Collectively, the findings underscore the functional potential of GCAG and GFAG in next-generation energy conversion and storage devices.

Graphical Abstract