<p>Gross alpha and beta (GAB) measurements provide a rapid screening tool for assessing radionuclide contamination in water. This study aimed to establish a sensitive, simple method for low-level GAB detection using a liquid scintillation counter (LSC). Different sample preparation approaches (direct, co-precipitation with Fe(OH)<sub>3</sub>, Ca<sub>3</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, MnO<sub>2</sub>, and evaporation) were tested on four water samples containing natural and anthropogenic radionuclides from the IAEA 2022 proficiency test. Results, evaluated by recoveries and Zeta-scores, showed preparation methods influence recovery and quenching. Co-precipitation with Ca<sub>3</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and evaporation performed best, though GAB remains a complementary rather than absolute analytical method, as not all radionuclides can be detected simultaneously.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A comparative study of the gross alpha and beta sample preparation method with a liquid scintillation counter

  • Leja Rovan Stiplošek,
  • Sian Patterson

摘要

Gross alpha and beta (GAB) measurements provide a rapid screening tool for assessing radionuclide contamination in water. This study aimed to establish a sensitive, simple method for low-level GAB detection using a liquid scintillation counter (LSC). Different sample preparation approaches (direct, co-precipitation with Fe(OH)3, Ca3(PO4)2, MnO2, and evaporation) were tested on four water samples containing natural and anthropogenic radionuclides from the IAEA 2022 proficiency test. Results, evaluated by recoveries and Zeta-scores, showed preparation methods influence recovery and quenching. Co-precipitation with Ca3(PO4)2 and evaporation performed best, though GAB remains a complementary rather than absolute analytical method, as not all radionuclides can be detected simultaneously.