<p>In this response to the editorial by J. J. Amon in <i>Health and Human Rights</i> (Amon, 2025), we reply to Dr. Amon’s claims alleging methodological problems and “politicalization” associated with our peer-reviewed work, which was published in the <i>Journal of Religion and Health</i> (Schwartz et al., 2025) and in the <i>Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal</i> (Roth &amp; Wald, 2025). Here, we offer our response, in which we provide additional details related to our informatics and statistical methodologies to refute claims raised in Amon’s editorial, that our analyses were conducted in a non-standardized manner. We also explain the distinctions between the critique of Israeli governmental policies and anti-Zionism, which is a form of antisemitism, as clearly defined by the consensus-driven International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (2016). Finally, we once again highlight the presence of the anti-Zionist form of antisemitism within medical communities and associated&#xa0;discourse.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Misleading Allegations and Failure to Recognize the Shifting Faces of Antisemitism: A Response to J.J. Amon

  • Daniella M. Schwartz,
  • Rotem Leiba,
  • Cassondra L. Feldman,
  • Nicole Z. Spence,
  • Ruth Oratz,
  • Hedy S. Wald,
  • Steven Roth

摘要

In this response to the editorial by J. J. Amon in Health and Human Rights (Amon, 2025), we reply to Dr. Amon’s claims alleging methodological problems and “politicalization” associated with our peer-reviewed work, which was published in the Journal of Religion and Health (Schwartz et al., 2025) and in the Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal (Roth & Wald, 2025). Here, we offer our response, in which we provide additional details related to our informatics and statistical methodologies to refute claims raised in Amon’s editorial, that our analyses were conducted in a non-standardized manner. We also explain the distinctions between the critique of Israeli governmental policies and anti-Zionism, which is a form of antisemitism, as clearly defined by the consensus-driven International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (2016). Finally, we once again highlight the presence of the anti-Zionist form of antisemitism within medical communities and associated discourse.