Scholarlink

<p>Human oversight is widely invoked as a safeguard in clinical AI, yet it is often treated as a single, stable property. In practice, clinicians remain responsible for AI-assisted decisions without remaining able to meaningfully review the basis of the output. This tension becomes sharper as systems become multimodal, agentic, and cognitively ambitious. We propose a distinction between cognitive and normative oversight and discuss its implications for AI evaluation and deployment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

When Useful Clinical AI Exceeds Meaningful Oversight

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月1日

查看全文
  • Jonas Ver Berne,
  • Reinhilde Jacobs

摘要

Human oversight is widely invoked as a safeguard in clinical AI, yet it is often treated as a single, stable property. In practice, clinicians remain responsible for AI-assisted decisions without remaining able to meaningfully review the basis of the output. This tension becomes sharper as systems become multimodal, agentic, and cognitively ambitious. We propose a distinction between cognitive and normative oversight and discuss its implications for AI evaluation and deployment.