Scholarlink

Objective <p>This commentary critically examines queer intimate partner violence (IPV) across Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD)—a category of societies disproportionately represented in psychological and social science research—and non-WEIRD sociocultural contexts. It argues that prevailing cis-heteronormative and Western-centric frameworks insufficiently capture the complexity of queer survivors’ experiences.</p> Method <p>I drew on empirical research and cross-cultural comparisons to examine IPV and barriers to help-seeking among queer individuals.</p> Results <p>Evidence from both WEIRD and non-WEIRD context demonstrates how sociopolitical climates, cultural norms, and institutional arrangements profoundly shape patterns of IPV and access to support. Across contexts, a shared theme of “institutional abandonment” emerges, wherein queer survivors remain underserved even within systems that appear formally inclusive.</p> Conclusions <p>This commentary highlights the urgent need for a decolonized, queer-affirming approach to IPV research. Advancing IPV research requires the development of culturally grounded, identity-sensitive measurement tools, the transformation of institutional and community support systems and the cultivation of equitable global academic partnerships. Effectively addressing queer IPV necessitates moving beyond universalized Western frameworks toward intersectional, contextually nuanced approaches that authentically reflect the diversity of queer experiences worldwide.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Cross-Cultural Reflections on Queer Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月19日

查看全文
  • Esra Ummak

摘要

Objective

This commentary critically examines queer intimate partner violence (IPV) across Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD)—a category of societies disproportionately represented in psychological and social science research—and non-WEIRD sociocultural contexts. It argues that prevailing cis-heteronormative and Western-centric frameworks insufficiently capture the complexity of queer survivors’ experiences.

Method

I drew on empirical research and cross-cultural comparisons to examine IPV and barriers to help-seeking among queer individuals.

Results

Evidence from both WEIRD and non-WEIRD context demonstrates how sociopolitical climates, cultural norms, and institutional arrangements profoundly shape patterns of IPV and access to support. Across contexts, a shared theme of “institutional abandonment” emerges, wherein queer survivors remain underserved even within systems that appear formally inclusive.

Conclusions

This commentary highlights the urgent need for a decolonized, queer-affirming approach to IPV research. Advancing IPV research requires the development of culturally grounded, identity-sensitive measurement tools, the transformation of institutional and community support systems and the cultivation of equitable global academic partnerships. Effectively addressing queer IPV necessitates moving beyond universalized Western frameworks toward intersectional, contextually nuanced approaches that authentically reflect the diversity of queer experiences worldwide.