Purpose <p>Domestic violence transitional housing (DVTH) programs are in wide use to address survivor housing and safety needs. Despite frequent implementation, little research has been conducted about <i>how</i> services are provided and <i>what</i> the programmatic goals are for DVTH. The current study outlines a model for how advocacy is provided within DVTH programs, along with accompanying goals.</p> Methods <p>Advocates (<i>n</i> = 22) in six states working in DVTH programs participated in semi-structured interviews. Interpretive content analysis methods were used for analysis. </p> Results <p>The findings centered on two key elements of the DVTH model: (1) advocacy approaches and (2) DVTH goals for survivors during their time in the program, including eligibility for entry. Advocates describe the program model as community focused, survivor-defined, voluntary, and accessible. Voluntary services approaches ranged from <i>non-direct</i> to <i>directive</i>, with most programming using an <i>active encouragement</i> approach. Two <i>primary goals</i> and <i>four supporting</i> goals for survivors were identified as central to the DVTH model. The primary goals are housing stability and safety. The four supporting goals focus on supportive connections, healing, autonomy and efficacy, and economic stability.</p> Conclusion <p>Understanding the DVTH advocacy model can help guide future practice and research in assessing housing model impacts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Model for Advocacy Approaches and Goals in Domestic Violence Transitional Housing

  • Leila Wood,
  • Bethany Backes,
  • Rachel Voth Schrag,
  • Julia O’Connor,
  • Inbal Leibovits

摘要

Purpose

Domestic violence transitional housing (DVTH) programs are in wide use to address survivor housing and safety needs. Despite frequent implementation, little research has been conducted about how services are provided and what the programmatic goals are for DVTH. The current study outlines a model for how advocacy is provided within DVTH programs, along with accompanying goals.

Methods

Advocates (n = 22) in six states working in DVTH programs participated in semi-structured interviews. Interpretive content analysis methods were used for analysis.

Results

The findings centered on two key elements of the DVTH model: (1) advocacy approaches and (2) DVTH goals for survivors during their time in the program, including eligibility for entry. Advocates describe the program model as community focused, survivor-defined, voluntary, and accessible. Voluntary services approaches ranged from non-direct to directive, with most programming using an active encouragement approach. Two primary goals and four supporting goals for survivors were identified as central to the DVTH model. The primary goals are housing stability and safety. The four supporting goals focus on supportive connections, healing, autonomy and efficacy, and economic stability.

Conclusion

Understanding the DVTH advocacy model can help guide future practice and research in assessing housing model impacts.