Scholarlink

<p>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) mediate host recognition in the obligate fig-fig wasp mutualism, but studies on the chemical mechanisms maintaining pollinator host specificity in sympatric, phylogenetically distant fig species remain scarce. We investigated two sympatric dioecious fig species from different subgenera: <i>Ficus hispida</i> (pollinated by <i>Ceratosolen solmsi marchali</i>), and <i>Ficus hirta</i> (pollinated by <i>Valisia javana</i>), integrating behavioral assays, GC-MS, and GC-EAD to distinguish physiological perception from behavioral outcome. Both fig wasp species were attracted to host VOCs but showed species-specific responses to non-host odors: <i>V. javana</i> actively avoided non-host volatiles, whereas <i>C. solmsi marchali</i> showed no preference. GC-MS identified 44 compounds in <i>F. hispida</i> and 47 in <i>F. hirta</i>, with significant interspecific divergence (PERMANOVA, <i>p</i> = 0.001) but minimal seasonal variation within <i>F. hispida</i>. GC-EAD revealed that <i>C. solmsi marchali</i> perceived 15 host compounds in spring and 12 in summer; <i>V. javana</i> perceived 8 in spring and 5 in summer. Both species consistently perceived Linalool and 1,8-Cineole, but these ubiquitous plant volatiles alone cannot explain host specificity. Instead, specificity is likely conferred by the specific ratios in which common compounds and host-unique volatiles are combined—for example Indole and (<i>E</i>, <i>E</i>)-Cosmene in <i>F. hispida</i>, and α-Cedrene epoxide in <i>F. hirta</i>. By distinguishing perception from behavior, we show that host fidelity is maintained through species-specific VOC blends, with seasonal modulation of olfactory sensitivity further shaping pollinator responses. These findings contribute to understanding chemical communication evolution under sympatry and seasonal environmental variability.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Species-Specific Recognition in Fig-Wasp Mutualism: The Role of Volatile Blends and Seasonal Shifts in Olfactory Responses

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月27日

查看全文
  • Niannian Liang,
  • Benoit Lapeyre,
  • Ramil Kohkaew,
  • Yongxia Jia,
  • Magali Proffit,
  • Hui Yu

摘要

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) mediate host recognition in the obligate fig-fig wasp mutualism, but studies on the chemical mechanisms maintaining pollinator host specificity in sympatric, phylogenetically distant fig species remain scarce. We investigated two sympatric dioecious fig species from different subgenera: Ficus hispida (pollinated by Ceratosolen solmsi marchali), and Ficus hirta (pollinated by Valisia javana), integrating behavioral assays, GC-MS, and GC-EAD to distinguish physiological perception from behavioral outcome. Both fig wasp species were attracted to host VOCs but showed species-specific responses to non-host odors: V. javana actively avoided non-host volatiles, whereas C. solmsi marchali showed no preference. GC-MS identified 44 compounds in F. hispida and 47 in F. hirta, with significant interspecific divergence (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) but minimal seasonal variation within F. hispida. GC-EAD revealed that C. solmsi marchali perceived 15 host compounds in spring and 12 in summer; V. javana perceived 8 in spring and 5 in summer. Both species consistently perceived Linalool and 1,8-Cineole, but these ubiquitous plant volatiles alone cannot explain host specificity. Instead, specificity is likely conferred by the specific ratios in which common compounds and host-unique volatiles are combined—for example Indole and (E, E)-Cosmene in F. hispida, and α-Cedrene epoxide in F. hirta. By distinguishing perception from behavior, we show that host fidelity is maintained through species-specific VOC blends, with seasonal modulation of olfactory sensitivity further shaping pollinator responses. These findings contribute to understanding chemical communication evolution under sympatry and seasonal environmental variability.