Scholarlink

<p>While Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) serve millions of families of children with disabilities annually, there are few partnerships between PTIs and researchers. Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) reflect mutual relationships and collaborative approaches to address problems of practice. RPPs can help ensure that interventions are sustained in the real world. By understanding RPPs among researchers and PTIs, interventions may be more responsive to families of children disabilities and likely to be sustained in the community. In this study, we partnered with six PTIs to conduct a civic engagement program (CEP). The partnership included preparatory meetings and two six-hr CEPs for families of children with disabilities with each PTI. Data included meeting transcripts and a social validity interview with multiple staff members from each PTI. To facilitate a strong partnership with the PTI, the researchers acknowledged and leveraged the expertise and experience of the PTIs. Barriers to the partnerships included challenges with aspects of the research process. When considering partnering with PTIs, researchers may consider ways to ensure the research is family-friendly. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exploring Partnerships Between Parent Training and Information Centers and Researchers

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月28日

查看全文
  • Saury Ramos-Torres,
  • Meghan Burke,
  • Zach Rossetti

摘要

While Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) serve millions of families of children with disabilities annually, there are few partnerships between PTIs and researchers. Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) reflect mutual relationships and collaborative approaches to address problems of practice. RPPs can help ensure that interventions are sustained in the real world. By understanding RPPs among researchers and PTIs, interventions may be more responsive to families of children disabilities and likely to be sustained in the community. In this study, we partnered with six PTIs to conduct a civic engagement program (CEP). The partnership included preparatory meetings and two six-hr CEPs for families of children with disabilities with each PTI. Data included meeting transcripts and a social validity interview with multiple staff members from each PTI. To facilitate a strong partnership with the PTI, the researchers acknowledged and leveraged the expertise and experience of the PTIs. Barriers to the partnerships included challenges with aspects of the research process. When considering partnering with PTIs, researchers may consider ways to ensure the research is family-friendly. Implications for research and practice are discussed.