Scholarlink

<p>Robert Hare is inarguably among the most distinguished psychopathy researchers. Perhaps his most important contributions are the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL; Hare, <CitationRef CitationID="CR25">1980</CitationRef>) and the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, <CitationRef CitationID="CR28">1991</CitationRef>), measures coordinated closely with Cleckley’s (<CitationRef CitationID="CR14">1976</CitationRef>) original list of 16 features of psychopathy. The PCL(-R) became the main competitor to the conceptualization of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) provided within the highly successful and influential third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III; APA, (<CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1980</CitationRef>). The PCL(-R) challenged researchers to question the validity of the APA ASPD. We suggest that Hare’s perspective was ultimately recognized as being preferable albeit, not supririsngly, some questions and concerns have also been raised. In sum, the field of psychopathy benefited substantially by the insight, dedication, and research of Robert Hare.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Psychopathy, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, and Robert Hare

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月18日

查看全文
  • Thomas Widiger,
  • Cristina Crego,
  • Alexandra Hines

摘要

Robert Hare is inarguably among the most distinguished psychopathy researchers. Perhaps his most important contributions are the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL; Hare, 1980) and the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991), measures coordinated closely with Cleckley’s (1976) original list of 16 features of psychopathy. The PCL(-R) became the main competitor to the conceptualization of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) provided within the highly successful and influential third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III; APA, (1980). The PCL(-R) challenged researchers to question the validity of the APA ASPD. We suggest that Hare’s perspective was ultimately recognized as being preferable albeit, not supririsngly, some questions and concerns have also been raised. In sum, the field of psychopathy benefited substantially by the insight, dedication, and research of Robert Hare.