<p>The effect of post-bond annealing on the quantitative interfacial adhesion energy of low-temperature Cu–Cu bonding interfaces was systematically investigated using a double cantilever beam test. A two-step Ar/N<sub>2</sub> plasma treatment was applied to achieve low-temperature bonding. This treatment protected the Cu surface from oxidation by forming Cu nitrides such as Cu<sub>3</sub>N and Cu<sub>4</sub>N, which were confirmed via electron backscatter diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. Cu<sub>3</sub>N and Cu<sub>4</sub>N completely decomposed at 200&#xa0;°C, enabling pure Cu–Cu low-temperature bonding. The interfacial adhesion energy at post-bond annealing temperatures of 250&#xa0;°C, 300&#xa0;°C, and 350&#xa0;°C was 0.65 ± 0.05&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup>, 3.81 ± 0.61&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup>, and 4.12 ± 1.12&#xa0;J/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. As the post-bond annealing temperature increased, Cu atomic diffusion was enhanced, leading to the elimination of voids and seams, grain growth, and the disappearance of grain boundaries. Consequently, the improved Cu‒Cu bonding quality resulted in an increase in interfacial adhesion energy.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Low-temperature Cu–Cu bonding enabled by two-step plasma-induced Cu nitride formation and post-bond annealing

  • Yongbeom Kwon,
  • Eunbi Lee,
  • Junyoung Choi,
  • Sarah Eunkyung Kim,
  • So-Yeon Lee,
  • Young-Bae Park

摘要

The effect of post-bond annealing on the quantitative interfacial adhesion energy of low-temperature Cu–Cu bonding interfaces was systematically investigated using a double cantilever beam test. A two-step Ar/N2 plasma treatment was applied to achieve low-temperature bonding. This treatment protected the Cu surface from oxidation by forming Cu nitrides such as Cu3N and Cu4N, which were confirmed via electron backscatter diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. Cu3N and Cu4N completely decomposed at 200 °C, enabling pure Cu–Cu low-temperature bonding. The interfacial adhesion energy at post-bond annealing temperatures of 250 °C, 300 °C, and 350 °C was 0.65 ± 0.05 J/m2, 3.81 ± 0.61 J/m2, and 4.12 ± 1.12 J/m2, respectively. As the post-bond annealing temperature increased, Cu atomic diffusion was enhanced, leading to the elimination of voids and seams, grain growth, and the disappearance of grain boundaries. Consequently, the improved Cu‒Cu bonding quality resulted in an increase in interfacial adhesion energy.