<p>The structural characteristics, elastic properties, Debye temperatures, thermal conductivities, and damage tolerances of RuO<sub>2</sub> with different crystal structures (cubic RuO<sub>2</sub>-C and tetragonal RuO<sub>2</sub>-T) have been studied by means of first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). From the data obtained, RuO<sub>2</sub>-C and RuO<sub>2</sub>-T have thermodynamic stability and the dynamic stability of both phases is confirmed by the absence of imaginary frequencies in their phonon spectra. Furthermore, it can be seen that the deformation resistance of cubic structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-C) is greater than that of tetragonal structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-T); that is, cubic structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-C) has better stiffness and is not easy to deform. Meanwhile, cubic structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-C) has lower toughness, higher hardness, and weaker damage tolerance. In the aspect of elastic properties, 3D surface’s structure diagram and 2D plane projection diagram of Young’s modulus and shear modulus varying with direction are drawn to better visualize elastic anisotropy, which shows that the elastic anisotropy of tetragonal structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-T) is relatively large. In addition, cubic structure (RuO<sub>2</sub>-C) has larger Debye temperature, thermal conductivity, and smaller thermal expansion coefficient. This work provides the comprehensive first-principles comparison of the anisotropic elastic and thermal properties of cubic and tetragonal RuO<sub>2</sub>, offering fundamental insights for their potential applications in extreme environments.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Insights of anisotropic elastic, thermal properties, and damage tolerance of RuO2 by first-principles calculations

  • Jinrun Zhang,
  • Yonghua Duan,
  • Lin Su,
  • Linhui Su,
  • Shunbin Li,
  • Bo Huang

摘要

The structural characteristics, elastic properties, Debye temperatures, thermal conductivities, and damage tolerances of RuO2 with different crystal structures (cubic RuO2-C and tetragonal RuO2-T) have been studied by means of first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). From the data obtained, RuO2-C and RuO2-T have thermodynamic stability and the dynamic stability of both phases is confirmed by the absence of imaginary frequencies in their phonon spectra. Furthermore, it can be seen that the deformation resistance of cubic structure (RuO2-C) is greater than that of tetragonal structure (RuO2-T); that is, cubic structure (RuO2-C) has better stiffness and is not easy to deform. Meanwhile, cubic structure (RuO2-C) has lower toughness, higher hardness, and weaker damage tolerance. In the aspect of elastic properties, 3D surface’s structure diagram and 2D plane projection diagram of Young’s modulus and shear modulus varying with direction are drawn to better visualize elastic anisotropy, which shows that the elastic anisotropy of tetragonal structure (RuO2-T) is relatively large. In addition, cubic structure (RuO2-C) has larger Debye temperature, thermal conductivity, and smaller thermal expansion coefficient. This work provides the comprehensive first-principles comparison of the anisotropic elastic and thermal properties of cubic and tetragonal RuO2, offering fundamental insights for their potential applications in extreme environments.