<p>We studied the cause that field dependences of magnetization of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> single crystal are similar to that of ideal type II superconductor. Here, we present the cause of the behavior and main defects of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> single crystal. Boron-deficient stacking faults (SFs) are dominant defects of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> single crystal, which are a planar defect. SF is confirmed in a single grain of air-cooled 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. It was expected that they would show similar flux-pinning behavior with that of grain boundaries (GBs) because the two have nature of planar defect. We inspected first flux-pinning effects of increased GB by through of water-quenching of 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> superconductor. The width of GB was confirmed less than 1 nm by TEM. However, the distribution of atoms at neighborhoods of GB was a little distorted from regular array of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> owing to empty space of GB. On the other hand, width of SF was approximately less than 0.6 nm and it has almost no distortion of atoms around the neighborhoods. It was understood that planar defects in superconductor have flux-pinning effect as well as flux-penetrating effect. However, SF of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> does not have flux-pinning effect, but have flux-penetrating effect because of their narrow width and almost no distortion from regular array of the neighborhood atoms around SF, which would cause that field dependences of magnetization of <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2025_11566_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\hbox {MgB}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mtext>MgB</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> single crystal are similar to that of ideal type II superconductor.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analysis of M-H curve of MgB2 single crystal and stacking faults in MgB2 superconductor

  • G. C. Kim,
  • H. B. Lee,
  • Chul-Hong Park

摘要

We studied the cause that field dependences of magnetization of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 single crystal are similar to that of ideal type II superconductor. Here, we present the cause of the behavior and main defects of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 single crystal. Boron-deficient stacking faults (SFs) are dominant defects of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 single crystal, which are a planar defect. SF is confirmed in a single grain of air-cooled 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 . It was expected that they would show similar flux-pinning behavior with that of grain boundaries (GBs) because the two have nature of planar defect. We inspected first flux-pinning effects of increased GB by through of water-quenching of 5 wt.% (Fe, Ti) particle-doped \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 superconductor. The width of GB was confirmed less than 1 nm by TEM. However, the distribution of atoms at neighborhoods of GB was a little distorted from regular array of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 owing to empty space of GB. On the other hand, width of SF was approximately less than 0.6 nm and it has almost no distortion of atoms around the neighborhoods. It was understood that planar defects in superconductor have flux-pinning effect as well as flux-penetrating effect. However, SF of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 does not have flux-pinning effect, but have flux-penetrating effect because of their narrow width and almost no distortion from regular array of the neighborhood atoms around SF, which would cause that field dependences of magnetization of \(\hbox {MgB}_2\) MgB 2 single crystal are similar to that of ideal type II superconductor.