<p>Porosity defects and their effect on mechanical properties remain a concern in metals-based laser powder bed fusion, even for optimized process parameters. Instrumented micro/macroindentation with Berkovich and spherical tips to forces of 50&#xa0;N and 150&#xa0;N, respectively, were used to characterize three levels of porosity (fully dense, 1%, and 4%) created by decreasing and increasing the hatch spacing and two levels of heat treatments (stress-relieved and solution annealed). The spherical indentation data were converted to effective stress–strain curves along with an estimated modulus and yield stress. The Berkovich data were analyzed using the Oliver-Pharr method for modulus and hardness, and the hardness was used to estimate yield stress. The indentation results were compared against tensile results for the loading axis along the build direction (Z) and perpendicular to the build direction (X/Y). The modulus results largely agree for indentation and tensile tests. The average yield stress estimated from these indentation measurements captures the difference in heat treatment but does not capture subtle changes in porosity and test direction compared to tensile yield stress measurements. However, the indentation results show a considerable increase in scatter from test to test with the presence of porosity due to varying amount of porosity within the interaction volume under the indenter.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Instrumented micro/macroindentation of porosity defects in laser powder bed fusion 316L stainless steel

  • Jordan S. Weaver,
  • Houshang Yin,
  • Jesse Redford,
  • Xiaoyuan Lou

摘要

Porosity defects and their effect on mechanical properties remain a concern in metals-based laser powder bed fusion, even for optimized process parameters. Instrumented micro/macroindentation with Berkovich and spherical tips to forces of 50 N and 150 N, respectively, were used to characterize three levels of porosity (fully dense, 1%, and 4%) created by decreasing and increasing the hatch spacing and two levels of heat treatments (stress-relieved and solution annealed). The spherical indentation data were converted to effective stress–strain curves along with an estimated modulus and yield stress. The Berkovich data were analyzed using the Oliver-Pharr method for modulus and hardness, and the hardness was used to estimate yield stress. The indentation results were compared against tensile results for the loading axis along the build direction (Z) and perpendicular to the build direction (X/Y). The modulus results largely agree for indentation and tensile tests. The average yield stress estimated from these indentation measurements captures the difference in heat treatment but does not capture subtle changes in porosity and test direction compared to tensile yield stress measurements. However, the indentation results show a considerable increase in scatter from test to test with the presence of porosity due to varying amount of porosity within the interaction volume under the indenter.

Graphical Abstract