<p>The creep behavior of Mn-modified Al–Si–Mg–Cu–Mo alloy intended for diesel engine applications was investigated. Al–7Si–0.3Mg–0.5Cu–0.15Mn–0.3Mo (MG3-1) and Al–7Si–0.3Mg–0.5Cu–0.5Mn–0.3Mo (MG4-1) alloys presented apparent activation energies for creep of 203&#xa0;kJ&#xa0;mol<sup>−1</sup> and 249&#xa0;kJ&#xa0;mol<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. TEM results indicated that in both alloys, dynamic recovery was the rate-governing mechanism and sub-grains were associated with Si phase particles. MG4-1 had finer sub-grains and a lower creep rate than the MG3-1. In the MG3-1 alloy, the effective diffusion coefficient, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2024_10566_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="33" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({D}_{\text{eff}},\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mtext>eff</mtext> </msub> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of dynamic recovery and the apparent activation energy for creep, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10853_2024_10566_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({Q}_{a},\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> agreed with the coefficient and the activation energy of Mn diffusion in aluminum, respectively. Si diffusion played a key role in governing the creep rate of MG4-1 where Si diffusion was limited due to the stability of the <i>α</i>-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids; this limited the coarsening of Si particles and reduced their effect in initiating recovery. Differences in the size and coherency of <i>α</i>-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids were observed and were attributed to the higher thermal stability and lower coarsening rate of the intermetallics at the solutionizing temperature. Coherent shearable <i>α</i>-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids did not provide sub-grain boundary pining in MG3-1. Coherent non-shearable <i>α</i>-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids in the size range of 6&#xa0;nm pinned sub-grain boundaries in MG4-1. The apparent activation energy for creep in MG4-1 had contributions from the activation energy for Si diffusion in aluminum, pipe diffusion that governs sub-grain boundary migration, and Zener pinning by non-shearable coherent dispersoids.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The influence of dispersoids and solutes on the recovery processes of creep deformation in an Al–Si–Mg–Cu (Mo, Mn) diesel engine alloy

  • Raul Irving Arriaga-Benitez,
  • Mihriban Pekguleryuz

摘要

The creep behavior of Mn-modified Al–Si–Mg–Cu–Mo alloy intended for diesel engine applications was investigated. Al–7Si–0.3Mg–0.5Cu–0.15Mn–0.3Mo (MG3-1) and Al–7Si–0.3Mg–0.5Cu–0.5Mn–0.3Mo (MG4-1) alloys presented apparent activation energies for creep of 203 kJ mol−1 and 249 kJ mol−1, respectively. TEM results indicated that in both alloys, dynamic recovery was the rate-governing mechanism and sub-grains were associated with Si phase particles. MG4-1 had finer sub-grains and a lower creep rate than the MG3-1. In the MG3-1 alloy, the effective diffusion coefficient, \({D}_{\text{eff}},\) D eff , of dynamic recovery and the apparent activation energy for creep, \({Q}_{a},\) Q a , agreed with the coefficient and the activation energy of Mn diffusion in aluminum, respectively. Si diffusion played a key role in governing the creep rate of MG4-1 where Si diffusion was limited due to the stability of the α-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids; this limited the coarsening of Si particles and reduced their effect in initiating recovery. Differences in the size and coherency of α-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids were observed and were attributed to the higher thermal stability and lower coarsening rate of the intermetallics at the solutionizing temperature. Coherent shearable α-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids did not provide sub-grain boundary pining in MG3-1. Coherent non-shearable α-Al(Fe,Mn,Mo)Si dispersoids in the size range of 6 nm pinned sub-grain boundaries in MG4-1. The apparent activation energy for creep in MG4-1 had contributions from the activation energy for Si diffusion in aluminum, pipe diffusion that governs sub-grain boundary migration, and Zener pinning by non-shearable coherent dispersoids.