<p>Recently, Bandaru et al. and Borumand Saeid et al. introduced transitive <i>GE</i>-algebras (for short, <i>TGE</i>-algebras) and antisymmetric transitive <i>GE</i>-algebras (for short, <i>ATGE</i>-algebras), respectively. In this paper, we present <i>TGE</i>-logic, the corresponding logic to these algebras. We show that the variety of <i>TGE</i>-algebras forms an algebraic semantics for <i>TGE</i>-logic in the sense of (Blok &amp; Pigozzi, <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">1989</CitationRef>). Furthermore, we prove that <i>TGE</i>-logic is strongly sound and complete with respect to <i>TGE</i>-algebras. We demonstrate that the equivalent algebraic semantics for <i>TGE</i>-logic is the variety of <i>ATGE</i>-algebras and that <i>TGE</i>-logic is algebraizable in the sense of (Blok &amp; Pigozzi, <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">1989</CitationRef>). Moreover, we prove that <i>TGE</i>-logic is strongly sound and complete with respect to <i>ATGE</i>-algebras. We further prove each congruence relation <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on an <i>ATGE</i>-algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal {L}}= (L, *, 1) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>L</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mrow /> <mo>∗</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is uniquely determined by the equivalence class of 1 under <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where the quotient algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\frac{{\mathcal {L}}}{\theta }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfrac> <mi mathvariant="script">L</mi> <mi>θ</mi> </mfrac> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is an <i>ATGE</i>-algebra. Finally, we show the independence of the axioms of <i>TGE</i>-logic.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Logic for transitive GE-algebras

  • Masoud Haveshki,
  • Mahboobeh Mohamadhasani

摘要

Recently, Bandaru et al. and Borumand Saeid et al. introduced transitive GE-algebras (for short, TGE-algebras) and antisymmetric transitive GE-algebras (for short, ATGE-algebras), respectively. In this paper, we present TGE-logic, the corresponding logic to these algebras. We show that the variety of TGE-algebras forms an algebraic semantics for TGE-logic in the sense of (Blok & Pigozzi, 1989). Furthermore, we prove that TGE-logic is strongly sound and complete with respect to TGE-algebras. We demonstrate that the equivalent algebraic semantics for TGE-logic is the variety of ATGE-algebras and that TGE-logic is algebraizable in the sense of (Blok & Pigozzi, 1989). Moreover, we prove that TGE-logic is strongly sound and complete with respect to ATGE-algebras. We further prove each congruence relation \(\theta \) θ on an ATGE-algebra \({\mathcal {L}}= (L, *, 1) \) L = ( L , , 1 ) is uniquely determined by the equivalence class of 1 under \(\theta \) θ , where the quotient algebra \(\frac{{\mathcal {L}}}{\theta }\) L θ is an ATGE-algebra. Finally, we show the independence of the axioms of TGE-logic.