<p>This paper investigates the logic of grounding, a non-causal explanatory relation. While the study of this field is flourishing, it is still in its early stages. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, a novel sequent calculus for weak full grounding. While it provides a sequent-style presentation of the existing axiomatic system <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{LWG}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> proposed by Adam Lovett, our calculus is balanced and avoids the ad-hoc rules contained in <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{LWG}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. An important fact shown in this paper is that if a sequent <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Gamma \Rightarrow \Delta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⇒</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is derivable in <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, then any variable occurring positively (or negatively) in <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Gamma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> also occurs positively (or negatively) in <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This highlights a deep connection between grounding and variable inclusion. This property, in particular, suggests a similarity to Rohan French’s sequent calculus for analytic containment, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{AC}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">AC</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Indeed, we demonstrate that <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the negation dual of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{AC}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">AC</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The paper concludes by proving the equivalence between <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{LWG}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="bold">LWG</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A Simple Sequent Calculus for Weak Full Grounding

  • Shogo Tsuboi

摘要

This paper investigates the logic of grounding, a non-causal explanatory relation. While the study of this field is flourishing, it is still in its early stages. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\) G LWG , a novel sequent calculus for weak full grounding. While it provides a sequent-style presentation of the existing axiomatic system \(\textbf{LWG}\) LWG proposed by Adam Lovett, our calculus is balanced and avoids the ad-hoc rules contained in \(\textbf{LWG}\) LWG . An important fact shown in this paper is that if a sequent \(\Gamma \Rightarrow \Delta \) Γ Δ is derivable in \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\) G LWG , then any variable occurring positively (or negatively) in \(\Gamma \) Γ also occurs positively (or negatively) in \(\Delta \) Δ . This highlights a deep connection between grounding and variable inclusion. This property, in particular, suggests a similarity to Rohan French’s sequent calculus for analytic containment, \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{AC}}\) G AC . Indeed, we demonstrate that \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\) G LWG is the negation dual of \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{AC}}\) G AC . The paper concludes by proving the equivalence between \(\mathcal {G}_{\textbf{LWG}}\) G LWG and \(\textbf{LWG}\) LWG .