错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation based on atrial electrogram duration map: methodology and clinical outcomes from the AEDUM pilot study

  • Pietro Rossi,
  • Filippo Maria Cauti,
  • Marco Polselli,
  • Michele Magnocavallo,
  • Marta Niscola,
  • Veronica Fanti,
  • Luca Rosario Limite,
  • Antonietta Evangelista,
  • Alessandro Bellisario,
  • Ruggero De Paolis,
  • Simone Facchetti,
  • Raffaele Quaglione,
  • Gianfranco Piccirillo,
  • Stefano Bianchi

摘要

Background

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) represents a challenge for the electrophysiologist and there are still divergences regarding the best ablative approach to adopt. Create a new map of the duration of atrial bipolar electrograms (Atrial Electrogram DUration Map, AEDUM) to recognize a functional substrate during sinus rhythm and guide a patient-tailored ablative strategy for PsAF.

Methods

Forty PsAF subjects were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either for PVI alone (Group B1) or PVI+AEDUM areas ablation (Group B2). A cohort of 15 patients without AF history undergoing left-sided accessory pathway ablation was used as a control group (Group A). In all patients, voltage and AEDUM maps were created during sinus rhythm. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, with rhythm monitoring via 48-h ECG Holter or by implantable cardiac device.

Results

Electrogram (EGM) duration was higher in Group B than in Group A (49±16.2ms vs 34.2±3.8ms; p-value<0.001). In Group B the mean cumulative AEDUM area was 21.8±8.2cm2; no difference between the two subgroups was observed (22.3±9.1cm2 vs 21.2±7.2cm2; p-value=0.45). The overall bipolar voltage recorded inside the AEDUM areas was lower than in the remaining atrial areas [median: 1.30mV (IQR: 0.71–2.38mV) vs 1.54mV (IQR: 0.79–2.97mV); p-value: <0.001)]. Low voltage areas (<0.5mV) were recorded in three (7.5%) patients in Group B. During the follow-up [median 511 days (376–845days)] patients who underwent PVI-only experienced more AF recurrence than those receiving a tailored approach (65% vs 35%; p-value= 0.04).

Conclusions

All PsAF patients exhibited AEDUM areas. An ablation approach targeting these areas resulted in a more effective strategy compared with PVI only.

Graphical Abstract