Scholarlink

<p>Political philosophers often idealise, that is, they deliberately misrepresent. This differs from omitting, which is representing something with less detail, but without assuming any falsehood. Idealising is a tool that scholars can use to their advantage. However, idealising has pitfalls, and failing to avoid them can have dangerous consequences. Drawing on economics, where idealising is controversial, I illustrate two pitfalls of idealising in political philosophy: simplifying and distorting, and I show the different dangers that arise if these pitfalls aren’t avoided. This is not a plea against idealisations but rather a guide for their safe and secure use in political philosophy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Pitfalls and Dangers of Idealising in Political Philosophy

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月29日

查看全文
  • Max Molden

摘要

Political philosophers often idealise, that is, they deliberately misrepresent. This differs from omitting, which is representing something with less detail, but without assuming any falsehood. Idealising is a tool that scholars can use to their advantage. However, idealising has pitfalls, and failing to avoid them can have dangerous consequences. Drawing on economics, where idealising is controversial, I illustrate two pitfalls of idealising in political philosophy: simplifying and distorting, and I show the different dangers that arise if these pitfalls aren’t avoided. This is not a plea against idealisations but rather a guide for their safe and secure use in political philosophy.