<p>We present a comprehensive framework for p–n junction simulation that bridges analytical models, numerical methods, and machine learning approaches. A hybrid finite-difference physics-informed neural network solver is developed and validated across 12 silicon devices with doping concentrations ranging from <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(10^{15}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>15</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(10^{19}\,\textrm{cm}^{-3}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>19</mn> </msup> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <msup> <mtext>cm</mtext> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The surrogate model reproduces Sentaurus TCAD results with <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0.48\%\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>0.48</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> RMS potential error while revealing that analytical models systematically underestimate the built-in potential by up to 8 mV at high doping concentrations. This error leads to a <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(3\%\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> overestimation of solar cell short-circuit current in predictive models. The framework achieves a <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(47\times\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>47</mn> <mo>×</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> speed-up compared to conventional TCAD simulations and is successfully extended to 2D geometries (<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(50 \times 50\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>50</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> mesh) without architectural modifications, maintaining 0.62% RMS error with <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(12\times\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>12</mn> <mo>×</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> acceleration. All implementation code, datasets, and reproduction scripts are openly available under an MIT license.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Hybrid PINN-TCAD framework for sub-percent p–n junction simulation with spillover error quantification

  • Alfred V. Petrosyan,
  • Armen S. Yepiskoposyan

摘要

We present a comprehensive framework for p–n junction simulation that bridges analytical models, numerical methods, and machine learning approaches. A hybrid finite-difference physics-informed neural network solver is developed and validated across 12 silicon devices with doping concentrations ranging from \(10^{15}\) 10 15 to \(10^{19}\,\textrm{cm}^{-3}\) 10 19 cm - 3 . The surrogate model reproduces Sentaurus TCAD results with \(0.48\%\) 0.48 % RMS potential error while revealing that analytical models systematically underestimate the built-in potential by up to 8 mV at high doping concentrations. This error leads to a \(3\%\) 3 % overestimation of solar cell short-circuit current in predictive models. The framework achieves a \(47\times\) 47 × speed-up compared to conventional TCAD simulations and is successfully extended to 2D geometries ( \(50 \times 50\) 50 × 50 mesh) without architectural modifications, maintaining 0.62% RMS error with \(12\times\) 12 × acceleration. All implementation code, datasets, and reproduction scripts are openly available under an MIT license.