<p>Lateral superjunctions (LSJ) are potential candidates for CMOS compatible high voltage devices in next-generation power integrated circuits. The prior works have modeled and developed design guidelines only for an ideal balanced LSJ, i.e., having equal charge in the n- and p-pillars. However, inevitable process variation during fabrication results in charge imbalance, <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({k_{N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, that yields a breakdown voltage, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V_\textrm{BR}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>BR</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, significantly lower than the target breakdown voltage, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="62" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V_\textrm{BR,target}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>BR,target</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this work, we use the method of Lagrange multipliers to derive analytical equations for the optimum pillar parameters of an LSJ; these parameters yield the minimum specific ON-resistance, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R_\textrm{ONSP}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mtext>ONSP</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, for a <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="62" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V_\textrm{BR,target}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>BR,target</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({k_{N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The analytical solutions are verified using well-calibrated TCAD simulations for 0.1–1 kV Si LSJs and 1–10 kV 4H-SiC LSJs for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({k_{N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from 0.05 to 0.30 (signifying 5 to 30% imbalance between the n- and p-pillar charge). Our solutions show that the optimum aspect ratio, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="15" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({r_{0}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, varies between 8–12 for Si LSJs and 10–15 for 4H-SiC LSJs. Notably, our solution for an LSJ is found to yield significantly different optimum pillar parameters than our earlier solution for a vertical SJ for the same <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V_\textrm{BR}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mtext>BR</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({k_{N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>k</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, due to the difference in their dependency of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10825_2025_2432_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({R_\textrm{ONSP}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mtext>ONSP</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on the pillar parameters. This justifies the need for customized solution for the design of LSJ.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimum design of a lateral superjunction considering charge imbalance due to process variations

  • Rachita Mohapatra,
  • K. Akshay

摘要

Lateral superjunctions (LSJ) are potential candidates for CMOS compatible high voltage devices in next-generation power integrated circuits. The prior works have modeled and developed design guidelines only for an ideal balanced LSJ, i.e., having equal charge in the n- and p-pillars. However, inevitable process variation during fabrication results in charge imbalance, \({k_{N}}\) k N , that yields a breakdown voltage, \({V_\textrm{BR}}\) V BR , significantly lower than the target breakdown voltage, \({V_\textrm{BR,target}}\) V BR,target . In this work, we use the method of Lagrange multipliers to derive analytical equations for the optimum pillar parameters of an LSJ; these parameters yield the minimum specific ON-resistance, \({R_\textrm{ONSP}}\) R ONSP , for a \({V_\textrm{BR,target}}\) V BR,target and \({k_{N}}\) k N . The analytical solutions are verified using well-calibrated TCAD simulations for 0.1–1 kV Si LSJs and 1–10 kV 4H-SiC LSJs for \({k_{N}}\) k N from 0.05 to 0.30 (signifying 5 to 30% imbalance between the n- and p-pillar charge). Our solutions show that the optimum aspect ratio, \({r_{0}}\) r 0 , varies between 8–12 for Si LSJs and 10–15 for 4H-SiC LSJs. Notably, our solution for an LSJ is found to yield significantly different optimum pillar parameters than our earlier solution for a vertical SJ for the same \({V_\textrm{BR}}\) V BR and \({k_{N}}\) k N , due to the difference in their dependency of \({R_\textrm{ONSP}}\) R ONSP on the pillar parameters. This justifies the need for customized solution for the design of LSJ.