错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Beyond the egg: sperm source does not impact cumulative live birth rates in autologous oocyte cryopreservation patients when adjusted for oocyte age

  • Jillian Pecoriello,
  • Amelia Kelly,
  • Jennifer Blakemore,
  • Sarah Cascante

摘要

Purpose

To assess the impact of sperm source on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after oocyte thaw in autologous oocyte cryopreservation (AOC) patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of autologous oocyte thaw patients at an urban academic fertility center from 2006 to 2021. Patients were stratified by sperm source [partner sperm (PS) vs. donor sperm (DS)]. The primary outcome was CLBR per patient. Secondary outcomes were the oocyte survival rate and usable embryo rate. Statistics included Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, Fisher’s exact, chi-square, two-sample t-tests, and multiple logistic regression (p < 0.05).

Results

A total of 653 patients were included; 455 (69.7%) used PS and 198 (30.3%) used DS. Time from the first AOC to the first thaw did not differ among DS and PS users (56.8 vs. 54.0 months, p = 0.20). PS users were younger at AOC (37.9 vs. 38.5 years, p < 0.001) and thaw (42.3 vs. 43.1 years, p < 0.001). There were equivalent overall CLBRs (39.9% PS vs. 40.6% DS, p = 0.85) and CLBRs in patients < 35 years at AOC (51.2% PS vs. 100% DS, p = 0.18), 35–37 years at AOC (45.9% PS vs. 60.4% DS, p = 0.10), 38–40 years at AOC (35.4% PS vs. 35.2% DS, p = 0.93), 41–42 years at AOC (28.9% PS vs 14.3% DS, p = 0.21), and > 43 years at AOC (12.5% PS vs 16.7% DS, p = 0.83) among PS and DS users. There were no significant differences in the oocyte survival (79% PS vs 80.5% DS, p = 0.08) or the proportion of patients with usable embryos (27.3% vs 27.8%, p = 0.70) between PS and DS groups.

Conclusions

In AOC patients, CLBR, oocyte survival rate, and usable embryo rate did not differ based on sperm source.