Scholarlink

<p>Phishing emails are widely recognized as a key warning sign of predatory publishing. Despite growing awareness of these tactics, the term phishing email remains loosely defined, and many researchers—particularly early-career scholars—struggle to distinguish deceptive emails from legitimate journal communications. This article presents 20 specific red flags, supplemented with real-life examples, to equip researchers with practical tools to recognize and avoid predatory journal phishing attempts. The article explains misleading indicators that predatory journals use to project an illusion of credibility and legitimacy, such as having ISSN (International Standard Serial Number) or DOI (Digital Object Identifier), being indexed in popular databases, or providing free-of-charge publication. Furthermore, the article highlights the values of a holistic approach and self-reflection in judging the legitimacy of research journals.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Twenty Red Flags To Spot Phishing Emails from Predatory Journals

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月15日

查看全文
  • Sameh Eltaybani

摘要

Phishing emails are widely recognized as a key warning sign of predatory publishing. Despite growing awareness of these tactics, the term phishing email remains loosely defined, and many researchers—particularly early-career scholars—struggle to distinguish deceptive emails from legitimate journal communications. This article presents 20 specific red flags, supplemented with real-life examples, to equip researchers with practical tools to recognize and avoid predatory journal phishing attempts. The article explains misleading indicators that predatory journals use to project an illusion of credibility and legitimacy, such as having ISSN (International Standard Serial Number) or DOI (Digital Object Identifier), being indexed in popular databases, or providing free-of-charge publication. Furthermore, the article highlights the values of a holistic approach and self-reflection in judging the legitimacy of research journals.